Reading in Relation: Youth Mentors and Adults Co-Constructing Teaching and Learning in a High School Literacy Classroom

被引:0
作者
Frankel, Katherine K. [1 ,4 ]
Nidumolu, Asha K. [1 ]
Ward, Alessandra E. [2 ]
Fields, Susan S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Boston, MA USA
[2] Wheaton Coll, Norton, MA USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA
[4] Wheelock Coll Educ & Human Dev, 2 Silber Way, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/07370008.2024.2349298
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Most schools operate as hierarchical structures, where adult stakeholders largely dictate what counts as knowledge and how to teach it. While previous scholarship has documented the promise of youth-led initiatives to trouble hierarchical structures, these explorations tend to occur outside of schools and do not typically account for the kinds of changes in relations between youth and adults necessary to disrupt hierarchical structures from within. Using third-generation cultural-historical activity theory as our theoretical framework, in this study we explore the shifts in subject-subject relations that emerged as high school youth literacy mentors, their teacher, and university researchers participated in iterative processes of co-configuration to open up new possibilities for literacy learning at their public school. We examine how youth mentors and adults co-designed and co-taught the Literacy Mentorship Class (LMC) while increasingly engaging contradictions as double binds within the Literacy Mentorship Debrief (LMD). We trace how evolving subject-subject relations in the LMD contributed to shifts in divisions of labor, rules, objects, and mediating artifacts in and beyond the LMC. Ultimately, we propose debriefs as a set of reflective practices to facilitate future possibilities for co-configuration among youth and adults that can be responsive to the particularities of any school community.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 454
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English [J].
Applebee, AN ;
Langer, JA ;
Nystrand, M ;
Gamoran, A .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2003, 40 (03) :685-730
[2]  
Bakhtin M., 1981, The dialogic imagination: Four essays
[3]   Participatory Design Research and Educational Justice: Studying Learning and Relations Within Social Change Making [J].
Bang, Megan ;
Vossoughi, Shirin .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2016, 34 (03) :173-193
[4]  
BATESON G, 1972, STEPS ECOLOGY MIND
[5]   Ethical Commitments in Community-Based Research with Youth [J].
Booker, Angela .
MIND CULTURE AND ACTIVITY, 2016, 23 (01) :15-27
[6]   A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures [J].
Cazden, C ;
Cope, B ;
Fairclough, N ;
Gee, J ;
Kalantzis, M ;
Kress, G ;
Luke, A ;
Luke, C ;
Michaels, S ;
Nakata, M .
HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 1996, 66 (01) :60-92
[7]  
Cole M., 1996, CULTURAL PSYCHOL ONC
[8]  
Cole M., 1983, Distributed cognition: Psychology and educational considerations, P1
[9]   Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work [J].
Engeström, Y .
ERGONOMICS, 2000, 43 (07) :960-974
[10]  
Engestrom Y., 2002, Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education, P211