Efficient fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making for optimal college location selection: A comparative study of min-max fuzzy TOPSIS

被引:2
|
作者
Sahoo, Diptirekha [1 ]
Parida, Prashanta Kumar [1 ]
Pati, Bibudhendu [2 ]
机构
[1] CV Raman Global Univ, Dept Math, Bhubaneswar 752054, Odisha, India
[2] Rama Devi Womens Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Dept & Org, Bhubaneswar 751022, Odisha, India
来源
RESULTS IN CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making; Fuzzy pairwise comparison; Min-max operations; Negative ideal solution; Positive ideal solution; CRITERIA; MODEL; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.rico.2024.100422
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Ranking fuzzy values is often essential in fuzzy multi -criteria decision -making (FMCDM) systems since it is established on the comparison of hazy data pairs, even though the comparison needs temporal complexity. Then to provide a fuzzy MCDM approach under min-max operations for avoiding the fuzzy comparison. By using fuzzy TOPSIS's min and max operations, the suggested method produces two positive and negative ideal solutions of each alternative. Here, before discussing the effectiveness of the matrices between the alternatives, first to analyze the weighted strength and weakness indices from both positive and negative indices. The results of the method have been described using a straightforward case study of a proper location for creating a college. The best location can be identified using this method based on various criteria. The outcomes are also compared with the suggested method for its effectiveness. Additionally, this problem analyzes the fuzzy TOPSIS approach in an interval -valued number for greater efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Optimal selection of safety recommendations: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach to HAZOP
    Cheraghi, Morteza
    Baladeh, Aliakbar Eslami
    Khakzad, Nima
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2022, 74
  • [12] The Evaluation of Computer Algebra Systems Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models: Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Huseyinov, Ilham
    Tabak, Feride Savaroglu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE INNOVATION, 2020, 8 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [13] Extended EDAS Method for Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making: An Application to Supplier Selection
    Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Turskis, Zenonas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2016, 11 (03) : 358 - 371
  • [14] Appication of Fuzzy Probabilistic TOPSIS on a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Problem
    Bandyopadhyay, Susmita
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 IEEE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICECCT), 2017,
  • [15] Green supplier development programmes selection: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Pourjavad, Ehsan
    Shahin, Arash
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2020, 13 (06) : 463 - 472
  • [16] A Fermatean Fuzzy ELECTRE Method for Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making
    Zhou, Li-Ping
    Wan, Shu-Ping
    Dong, Jiu-Ying
    INFORMATICA, 2022, 33 (01) : 181 - 224
  • [17] An intuitionsitic fuzzy judgement matrix and TOPSIS integrated multi-criteria decision making method for green supplier selection
    Cao, Qingwei
    Wu, Jian
    Liang, Changyong
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 28 (01) : 117 - 126
  • [18] A stochastic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making for sustainable vendor selection in Indian petroleum refining sector
    Akhtar, Mohammad
    Ahmad, Md Tanweer
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (03) : 963 - 996
  • [19] Equipment selection based on two different fuzzy multi criteria decision making methods: Fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR
    Alpay, Serafettin
    Iphar, Melih
    OPEN GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 10 (01): : 661 - 677
  • [20] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system
    Wang, Jiang-Jiang
    Jing, You-Yin
    Zhang, Chun-Fa
    Shi, Guo-Hua
    Zhang, Xu-Tao
    ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (10) : 3823 - 3832