Incidence and Predictors of Subsidence Using Modular, Tapered, Fluted Titanium Femoral Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Baldwin, Thomas J. [1 ]
Deckard, Evan R. [2 ]
Buller, Leonard T. [1 ]
Meneghini, R. Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Indiana Joint Replacement Inst, 1725 North 5th St, Terre Haute, IN 47804 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 05期
关键词
revision total hip arthroplasty; tapered fluted titanium femoral stem; subsidence; patient -reported outcomes; survivorship; revision rate; 17-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; UNITED-STATES; BONE LOSS; MIGRATION; COMPONENT; FIXATION; PROJECTIONS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.057
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Tapered, fluted titanium (TFT) femoral stems have become the gold standard in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). However, there is a paucity of data on TFT stem subsidence rates following aseptic rTHA. Subsidence can lead to instability, mechanical failure, leg -length discrepancy, and may require revision surgery. This study evaluated the incidences and predictors of TFT subsidence in aseptic rTHA. Methods: A total of 102 TFT femoral stems of 4 designs were retrospectively reviewed. Stem subsidence was measured on digital radiographs taken immediately after surgery and at standard clinical follow-up. Patient characteristics, risk factors for subsidence, revision etiologies, and implant characteristics were recorded. Patient -reported outcome measures were also evaluated for a subset of cases. Results: Overall, 12% of stems subsided >1 cm, and subsidence was minimal ( <3 mm) in >= 64% of cases. From immediate postoperative to 1 -month radiographic follow-up, 79% of stems subsided a mean of 2.9 mm (range, 0.1 to 12 mm). Beyond 1 month, subsidence was minimal for >= 77% of cases. In multivariate analyses, women and less femoral implant canal fill were associated with greater subsidence ( P < .034). The TFT stem design was not associated with early subsidence ( P =.816). There were no modular junction fractures. There were 2 fractures and 2 subsidence -related revisions for aseptic loosening that occurred postoperatively. Conclusions: The amount of subsidence in TFT stems was low and was detectable in the early (less than 1 year) postoperative period. Maximizing TFT stem fill within the femoral canal appears to reduce the risk of subsidence without increasing femoral fracture rates and should be the goal with implantation of these devices. Level of Evidence: IV -Case Series, No Control Group. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1304 / 1311
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Cottino, Umberto
    Larson, Dirk R.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Lewallen, David G.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (10): : 873 - 881
  • [2] Tapered, Fluted, Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Zitsch, Bradford p.
    Byrd, Jay j.
    Buckner, Brandt
    Konigsberg, Beau s.
    Hartman, Curtis w.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2025, 48 (02)
  • [3] Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Oncologic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Game Changer?
    Bingham, Joshua S.
    Tibbo, Meagan E.
    Beauchamp, Christopher P.
    Lewallen, David G.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (12): : 3692 - 3696
  • [4] Role and results of tapered fluted modular titanium stems in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Munro, J. T.
    Garbuz, D. S.
    Masri, B. A.
    Duncan, C. P.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (11): : 58 - 60
  • [5] Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems
    Garbuz, Donald S.
    Toms, Andrew
    Masri, Bassam A.
    Duncan, Clive P.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (453) : 199 - 202
  • [6] Modular Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Hip Arthroplasty
    DeRogatis, Michael J.
    Wintermeyer, Elke
    Sperring, Thomas R.
    Issack, Paul S.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (08): : 745 - 754
  • [7] What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Huang, Yong
    Zhou, Yixin
    Shao, Hongyi
    Gu, Jianming
    Tang, Hao
    Tang, Qiheng
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (10): : 3108 - 3113
  • [8] Implant breakage and revision factors for modular fluted tapered stems in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Lucena, Thibaut
    Cavaignac, Etienne
    Courtot, Louis
    Marot, Vincent
    Chiron, Philippe
    Reina, Nicolas
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 34 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [9] Risk Factors for Subsidence of Modular Fluted Tapered Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Fractures
    Parry, Joshua A.
    Hernandez, Nicolas M.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Yuan, Brandon J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (09): : 2967 - 2970
  • [10] Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Modular Fluted Tapered Stem for a Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture
    Hannon, Charles P. P.
    Abdel, Matthew P. P.
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 13 (03):