Blockchain technology and Social Life Cycle Assessment: synergies and implications

被引:1
作者
D'Eusanio, Manuela [1 ]
Petti, Luigia [1 ]
机构
[1] G dAnnunzio Univ Chieti Pescara, Dept Econ Studies DEc, Chieti, Italy
关键词
Social sustainability; Social assessment; IoT technologies; SO-LCA; Supply chain management; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-024-02338-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) allows for quantifying the social aspects related to the life cycle of a product and/or organization through an integrated and holistic approach. While there have been methodological and implementation advancements over the last years, there are still several critical issues, such as concern about the quality and availability of the data used in the assessment process. Therefore, this study aims to discuss the main peculiarities of Blockchain Technology and how it could be useful for S-LCA applications.Method The characteristics of Blockchain Technology were investigated in order to understand how and whether can be a synergistic support in the implementation of S-LCA. In order to do this, the main challenges and gaps of S-LCA methodology are identified. Therefore, a literature analysis was performed to identify the characteristics of Blockchain Technology within the context of SCM, how these peculiarities already support the life cycle thinking (LCT) tools, and whether these synergies can support also S-LCA studies.Results and discussion Blockchain is considered a revolutionary tool for supporting supply chain management due to its distributed data recording and assets tracking platform, which enhances transparency and provides real-time information. The traceability offered by Blockchain can be a valuable resource for conducting LCT studies, enabling improved data differentiation and origin identification as well as the identification of technology and inputs involved in analyzed product systems. Additionally, modeling a Blockchain to incorporate social data can aid in identifying locations, and the correlated social issues, where potential social risks occur by monitoring them over time. Consequently, a set of social indicators directly linked to social data should be defined for each supply chain evaluated.Conclusions The use of Blockchain Technology within S-LCA methodology approach will help organizations toward stronger supply chain management practices by tracing sustainable information related to products. Consequently, it can provide more transparent, reliable, and verifiable information to consumers on the product's life cycle. From a methodological perspective, Blockchain Technology can serve to collect social data along the supply chain, thereby contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the life cycle of the product. By doing so, it is possible to identify social and socio-economic risks throughout the supply chain and monitor them over time in order to be used as potential internal benchmarks. Further developments will be needed to define the integration of Blockchain Technology within the framework of S-LCA and more broadly in social organizational LCA.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Blockchain Technology for Oil and Gas: Implications and Adoption Framework Using Agile and Lean Supply Chains
    Aslam, Javed
    Saleem, Aqeela
    Khan, Nokhaiz Tariq
    Kim, Yun Bae
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [32] Modeling life-cycle social assessment in sustainable pavement management at project level
    Zheng, Xiaoyan
    Easa, Said M.
    Ji, Tao
    Jiang, Zhenliang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (06) : 1106 - 1118
  • [33] Social Life-Cycle Assessment of a Piece of Jewellery. Emphasis on the Local Community
    D'Eusanio, Manuela
    Serreli, Monica
    Petti, Luigia
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (04):
  • [34] Using life cycle sustainability assessment to trade off sourcing strategies for humanitarian relief items
    van Kempen, Elisah Antonia
    Spiliotopoulou, Eirini
    Stojanovski, Goran
    de Leeuw, Sander
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (11) : 1718 - 1730
  • [35] Social life cycle assessment of industrial gold mining in Mali
    Konare, Zan Mary
    Ajayi, Dickson Dare
    Ba, Sidy
    Aremu, Ademola Kabiru
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, : 702 - 717
  • [36] Ontology based social life cycle assessment for product development
    Shang, Zhen
    Wang, Meidan
    Su, Daizhong
    Liu, Qinhui
    Zhu, Shifan
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [37] A Social Life Cycle Assessment Framework for Additive Manufacturing Products
    Naghshineh, Bardia
    Lourenco, Francisco
    Godina, Radu
    Jacinto, Celeste
    Carvalho, Helena
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (13):
  • [38] Social Life Cycle Assessment as a resource for Responsible Research and Innovation
    Thorstensen, Erik
    Forsberg, Ellen-Marie
    JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2016, 3 (01) : 50 - 72
  • [39] The effects of blockchain technology adoption on business ethics and social sustainability: evidence from the Middle East
    Ronaghi, Mohammad Hossein
    Mosakhani, Mohammad
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (05) : 6834 - 6859
  • [40] Application of Social-Life Cycle Assessment in Urban Settings: Social Impact Assessment of Green Roofs
    Mazzucco, Giulia
    Canepa, Maria
    Perini, Katia
    BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (07)