Blockchain technology and Social Life Cycle Assessment: synergies and implications

被引:1
作者
D'Eusanio, Manuela [1 ]
Petti, Luigia [1 ]
机构
[1] G dAnnunzio Univ Chieti Pescara, Dept Econ Studies DEc, Chieti, Italy
关键词
Social sustainability; Social assessment; IoT technologies; SO-LCA; Supply chain management; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-024-02338-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) allows for quantifying the social aspects related to the life cycle of a product and/or organization through an integrated and holistic approach. While there have been methodological and implementation advancements over the last years, there are still several critical issues, such as concern about the quality and availability of the data used in the assessment process. Therefore, this study aims to discuss the main peculiarities of Blockchain Technology and how it could be useful for S-LCA applications.Method The characteristics of Blockchain Technology were investigated in order to understand how and whether can be a synergistic support in the implementation of S-LCA. In order to do this, the main challenges and gaps of S-LCA methodology are identified. Therefore, a literature analysis was performed to identify the characteristics of Blockchain Technology within the context of SCM, how these peculiarities already support the life cycle thinking (LCT) tools, and whether these synergies can support also S-LCA studies.Results and discussion Blockchain is considered a revolutionary tool for supporting supply chain management due to its distributed data recording and assets tracking platform, which enhances transparency and provides real-time information. The traceability offered by Blockchain can be a valuable resource for conducting LCT studies, enabling improved data differentiation and origin identification as well as the identification of technology and inputs involved in analyzed product systems. Additionally, modeling a Blockchain to incorporate social data can aid in identifying locations, and the correlated social issues, where potential social risks occur by monitoring them over time. Consequently, a set of social indicators directly linked to social data should be defined for each supply chain evaluated.Conclusions The use of Blockchain Technology within S-LCA methodology approach will help organizations toward stronger supply chain management practices by tracing sustainable information related to products. Consequently, it can provide more transparent, reliable, and verifiable information to consumers on the product's life cycle. From a methodological perspective, Blockchain Technology can serve to collect social data along the supply chain, thereby contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the life cycle of the product. By doing so, it is possible to identify social and socio-economic risks throughout the supply chain and monitor them over time in order to be used as potential internal benchmarks. Further developments will be needed to define the integration of Blockchain Technology within the framework of S-LCA and more broadly in social organizational LCA.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mapping of social sustainability attributes to stakeholders' involvement in construction project life cycle
    Kordi, Nurul Elma
    Belayutham, Sheila
    Ibrahim, Che Khairil Izam Che
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 39 (06) : 513 - 532
  • [22] Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mexico City's Water Cycle
    Garcia Sanchez, Maribel
    Padilla-Rivera, Alejandro
    Guereca, Leonor Patricia
    ADVANCED SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS, 2023, 7 (06)
  • [23] Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment
    Petti, Luigia
    Serreli, Monica
    Di Cesare, Silvia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (03) : 422 - 431
  • [24] Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius
    Foolmaun, Rajendra Kumar
    Ramjeeawon, Toolseeram
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (01) : 155 - 171
  • [25] Development and demonstration of a social sustainability assessment tool for the construction project life cycle
    Kordi, Nurul Elma
    Belayutham, Sheila
    Ibrahim, Che Khairil Izam Che
    CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND, 2025, 25 (01): : 165 - 186
  • [26] Introduction to evaluating energy justice across the life cycle: A social life cycle assessment approach
    Fortier, Marie-Odile P.
    Teron, Lemir
    Reames, Tony G.
    Munardy, Dynta Trishana
    Sullivan, Breck M.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 236 : 211 - 219
  • [27] A critical view on social performance assessment at company level: social life cycle analysis of an algae case
    Rafiaani, Parisa
    Kuppens, Tom
    Thomassen, Gwenny
    Van Dael, Miet
    Azadi, Hossein
    Lebailly, Philippe
    Van Passel, Steven
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (02) : 363 - 381
  • [28] Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Life Cycle Inventory Generation Methods and Implications for Life Cycle Assessment Results
    Parvatker, Abhijeet G.
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (01): : 350 - 367
  • [29] Life Cycle Assessment Research Trends and Implications: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Moutik, Badr
    Summerscales, John
    Graham-Jones, Jasper
    Pemberton, Richard
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [30] Stochastic Technology Choice Model for Consequential Life Cycle Assessment
    Kaetelhoen, Arne
    Bardow, Andre
    Suh, Sangwon
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (23) : 12575 - 12583