Covariate adjustment and estimation of difference in proportions in randomized clinical trials

被引:0
作者
Liu, Jialuo [1 ]
Xi, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Gilead Sci, Dept Biostat, Foster City, CA 94404 USA
关键词
binary outcome; covariate adjustment; difference in proportions; risk difference; sandwich formula; variance estimation; BINARY OUTCOMES; REGRESSION; CONSISTENT; VARIANCES;
D O I
10.1002/pst.2397
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Difference in proportions is frequently used to measure treatment effect for binary outcomes in randomized clinical trials. The estimation of difference in proportions can be assisted by adjusting for prognostic baseline covariates to enhance precision and bolster statistical power. Standardization or g-computation is a widely used method for covariate adjustment in estimating unconditional difference in proportions, because of its robustness to model misspecification. Various inference methods have been proposed to quantify the uncertainty and confidence intervals based on large-sample theories. However, their performances under small sample sizes and model misspecification have not been comprehensively evaluated. We propose an alternative approach to estimate the unconditional variance of the standardization estimator based on the robust sandwich estimator to further enhance the finite sample performance. Extensive simulations are provided to demonstrate the performances of the proposed method, spanning a wide range of sample sizes, randomization ratios, and model specification. We apply the proposed method in a real data example to illustrate the practical utility.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 905
页数:22
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2023, Adjusting for covariates in randomized clinical trials for drugs and biological products guidance for industry
  • [2] Bannick MS., 2023, PREPRINT
  • [3] Benkeser D, 2021, BIOMETRICS, V77, P1467, DOI 10.1111/biom.13377
  • [4] Betz J., TUTORIALS COVARIATE
  • [5] MACHINE LEARNING IN ECONOMETRICS Double/Debiased/Neyman Machine Learning of Treatment Effects
    Chernozhukov, Victor
    Chetverikov, Denis
    Demirer, Mert
    Duflo, Esther
    Hansen, Christian
    Newey, Whitney
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (05) : 261 - 265
  • [6] Iron Deficiency and Schooling Attainment in Peru
    Chong, Alberto
    Cohen, Isabelle
    Field, Erica
    Nakasone, Eduardo
    Torero, Maximo
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2016, 8 (04) : 222 - 255
  • [7] Making apples from oranges: Comparing noncollapsible effect estimators and their standard errors after adjustment for different covariate sets
    Daniel, Rhian
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Farewell, Daniel
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 63 (03) : 528 - 557
  • [8] Randomization does not justify logistic regression
    Freedman, David A.
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 23 (02) : 237 - 249
  • [9] GAIL MH, 1984, BIOMETRIKA, V71, P431
  • [10] Covariate-adjusted Difference in Proportions From Clinical Trials Using Logistic Regression and Weighted Risk Differences
    Ge, Miaomiao
    Durham, L. Kathryn
    Meyer, R. Daniel
    Xie, Wangang
    Thomas, Neal
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2011, 45 (04): : 481 - 493