Public Engagement in Health Policy-Making for Older Adults: A Systematic Search and Scoping Review

被引:0
作者
You, Jeonghwa [1 ]
Ganann, Rebecca [2 ]
Wilson, Michael [3 ,4 ]
Carusone, Soo Chan [1 ,5 ]
Macneil, Maggie [2 ]
Whitmore, Carly [2 ]
Dafel, Andrea [1 ]
Dhamanaskar, Roma [1 ]
Ling, Eugenia [2 ]
Dingman, Lance [5 ]
Falbo, A. Tina [5 ]
Kirk, Michael [5 ]
Luyckx, Joyce [5 ]
Petrie, Penelope [5 ]
Weldon, Donna [5 ]
Boothe, Katherine [6 ,7 ]
Abelson, Julia [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact HEI, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Hlth Forum, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Collaborat Hlth & Aging, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal CHEPA, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
health policy; long-term care; older adults; public engagement; public involvement; scoping review; senior; NATIONAL-SERVICE-FRAMEWORK; CARE; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; INVOLVEMENT; PRIORITIES; IMPACT; CONSUMERS; UPDATE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionAs the world's population ages, there has been increasing attention to developing health policies to support older adults. Engaging older adults in policy-making is one way to ensure that policy decisions align with their needs and priorities. However, ageist stereotypes often underestimate older adults' ability to participate in such initiatives. This scoping review aims to describe the characteristics and impacts of public engagement initiatives designed to help inform health policy-making for older adults.MethodsA systematic search of peer-reviewed and grey literature (English only) describing public engagement initiatives in health policy-making for older adults was conducted using six electronic databases, Google and the Participedia website. No geographical, methodological or time restrictions were applied to the search. Eligibility criteria were purposefully broad to capture a wide array of relevant engagement initiatives. The outcomes of interest included participants, engagement methods and reported impacts.ResultsThis review included 38 papers. The majority of public engagement initiatives were funded or initiated by governments or government agencies as a formal activity to address policy issues, compared to initiatives without a clear link to a specific policy-making process (e.g., research projects). While most initiatives engaged older adults as target participants, there was limited reporting on efforts to achieve participant diversity. Consultation-type engagement activities were most prevalent, compared to deliberative and collaborative approaches. Impacts of public engagement were frequently reported without formal evaluations. Notably, a few articles reported negative impacts of such initiatives.ConclusionThis review describes how public engagement practices have been conducted to help inform health policy-making for older adults and the documented impacts. The findings can assist policymakers, government staff, researchers and seniors' advocates in supporting the design and execution of public engagement initiatives in this policy sector.Patient or Public ContributionOlder adult partners from the McMaster University Collaborative for Health and Aging provided strategic advice throughout the key phases of this review, including developing a review protocol, data charting and synthesis and interpreting and presenting the review findings. This collaborative partnership was an essential aspect of this review, enhancing its relevance and meaningfulness for older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Development of the Engage with Impact Toolkit: A comprehensive resource to support the evaluation of patient, family and caregiver engagement in health systems [J].
Abelson, Julia ;
Tripp, Laura ;
MacNeil, Maggie ;
Lang, Amy ;
Fancott, Carol ;
Ganann, Rebecca ;
Granieri, Marisa ;
Hofstetter, Cathie ;
King, Bernice ;
Kristy, Betty-Lou ;
Maybee, Alies ;
Smith, Maureen ;
You, Jeonghwa .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (03) :1255-1265
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Participedia
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Ontario's Patient Engagement Framework
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, We Are All in This Together: An Aging Strategy for New Brunswick
[5]  
[Anonymous], About-Participedia
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Meaningful Participation of Older Persons and Civil Society in Policymaking
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Participedia Case #5084. Deliberations With Ontario Citizens on Mammography Screening
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IAP2 SPECTRUM PUBLIC
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Participedia Case #5549. Keeping Seniors Well Forum Richmond 2016
[10]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]