Is endoscopic technique an effective and safe alternative for lumbar interbody fusion? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Relvas-Silva, Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Pinto, Bernardo Sousa [3 ,4 ]
Sousa, Antonio [1 ,5 ]
Loureiro, Miguel [1 ,5 ]
Pinho, Andre Rodrigues [1 ,6 ]
Pereira, Pedro
机构
[1] Sao Joao Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Hosp Ctr, Porto, Portugal
[2] Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res CINTESIS, NeuroGen Res Grp, Rua Dr Placido da Costa, Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Informat & Hlth Decis Sci Fac Med, MEDCIDS Dept Community Med, Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Med, CINTESIS RISE Hlth Res Network, MEDCIDS, Porto, Portugal
[5] Hosp Forcas Armadas, Porto, Portugal
[6] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Dept Biomed, Unit Anat, Porto, Portugal
关键词
open surgery; minimally invasive surgery; endoscopic surgery; lumbar interbody fusion; lumbar degenerative disease; ADJACENT-SEGMENT DISEASE; DEGENERATIVE DISEASES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; MIS-TLIF; EVOLUTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
center dot Study design: Systematic review; meta-analysis. center dot Purpose: Lumbar degenerative disease is frequent and has a tremendous impact on patients' disability and quality-of-life. Open and minimally invasive procedures have been used to achieve adequate decompression and fusion. Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) is emerging as an alternative, trying to reduce morbidity, while achieving comparable to superior clinical outcomes. The aim of this work is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate how Endo-LIF compares to open or minimally invasive procedures. center dot Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane) were systematically reviewed using the query: '(percutaneous OR endoscop*) AND (open OR minimal* invasive) AND lumbar AND fusion'. PRISMA guidelines were followed. center dot Results: Twenty-seven articles were included (25 cohort study, 1 quasi-experimental study, and 1 randomized control trial; for meta-analytical results, only observational studies were considered). Endo-LIF conditioned longer operative time, with significantly lower blood loss, bedtime, and hospital length of stay. Early postoperative back pain favored endoscopic techniques. Endo-LIF and non-Endo-LIF minimally invasive surgery displayed comparable results for most back and leg pain or disability outcomes, despite Endo-LIF having been associated with higher disability at late follow-up (versus Open-LIF). No differences were found regarding fusion rates, cage subsidence, or adverse events. Definitive conclusions regarding fusion rate cannot be drawn due to low number of studies and unstandardized fusion definition. center dot Conclusion: Endo-LIF is an effective and safe alternative to conventional lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Evidence shortcomings may be addressed, and future randomized control trials may be performed to compare techniques and to validate results.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 555
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Hao
    Song, Yifan
    Li, Yiming
    Zhou, Hengcai
    Fu, Yufei
    Li, Jie
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [32] Lumbar Lordosis Correction with Interbody Fusion: Systematic Literature Review and Analysis
    Rothrock, Robert J.
    McNeill, Ian T.
    Yaeger, Kurt
    Oermann, Eric K.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    Caridi, John M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 118 : 21 - 31
  • [33] Titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cages vs. polyetheretherketone cages in lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Songfeng
    Li, Xiyong
    Bai, Xiaohui
    Wang, Yunlu
    Han, Pengfei
    Li, Hongzhuo
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2023, 25 (06)
  • [34] Fusion rate and complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis
    Xiao, Xun
    Duan, Heng
    Pan, Xin
    Zhao, Hua
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [35] Comparison of instrumented and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Lianghai
    Liu, Lantao
    Dong, Liang
    Xu, Zhengwei
    Zhang, Xiaobo
    Qian, Lixiong
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [36] Prevalence and risk factors for cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Qiujiang
    Long, Xingxia
    Shi, Lin
    Wang, Yinbin
    Guan, Tao
    Lv, Jinhan
    Cai, Lijun
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (49)
  • [37] Impact of Obesity on Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tang, Tao
    Wan, Bingwen
    Zhang, Xu
    Zhang, Alei
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 185 : E635 - E649
  • [38] Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis
    Xie Lei
    Wu WenJian
    Liang Yu
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2016, 129 (16) : 1969 - 1986
  • [39] Technique of Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Heo, Dong Hwa
    Hong, Young Ho
    Lee, Dong Chan
    Chung, Hun Jae
    Park, Choon Keun
    NEUROSPINE, 2020, 17 : S129 - S137
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases with or without auxiliary posterior fixation: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Kou, Nannan
    Zhang, Runyao
    Liu, Feifei
    Zhou, Hongliang
    Ren, Lirong
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2025, 26 (01)