Is endoscopic technique an effective and safe alternative for lumbar interbody fusion? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Relvas-Silva, Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Pinto, Bernardo Sousa [3 ,4 ]
Sousa, Antonio [1 ,5 ]
Loureiro, Miguel [1 ,5 ]
Pinho, Andre Rodrigues [1 ,6 ]
Pereira, Pedro
机构
[1] Sao Joao Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Hosp Ctr, Porto, Portugal
[2] Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res CINTESIS, NeuroGen Res Grp, Rua Dr Placido da Costa, Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Informat & Hlth Decis Sci Fac Med, MEDCIDS Dept Community Med, Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Med, CINTESIS RISE Hlth Res Network, MEDCIDS, Porto, Portugal
[5] Hosp Forcas Armadas, Porto, Portugal
[6] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Dept Biomed, Unit Anat, Porto, Portugal
关键词
open surgery; minimally invasive surgery; endoscopic surgery; lumbar interbody fusion; lumbar degenerative disease; ADJACENT-SEGMENT DISEASE; DEGENERATIVE DISEASES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; MIS-TLIF; EVOLUTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
center dot Study design: Systematic review; meta-analysis. center dot Purpose: Lumbar degenerative disease is frequent and has a tremendous impact on patients' disability and quality-of-life. Open and minimally invasive procedures have been used to achieve adequate decompression and fusion. Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) is emerging as an alternative, trying to reduce morbidity, while achieving comparable to superior clinical outcomes. The aim of this work is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate how Endo-LIF compares to open or minimally invasive procedures. center dot Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane) were systematically reviewed using the query: '(percutaneous OR endoscop*) AND (open OR minimal* invasive) AND lumbar AND fusion'. PRISMA guidelines were followed. center dot Results: Twenty-seven articles were included (25 cohort study, 1 quasi-experimental study, and 1 randomized control trial; for meta-analytical results, only observational studies were considered). Endo-LIF conditioned longer operative time, with significantly lower blood loss, bedtime, and hospital length of stay. Early postoperative back pain favored endoscopic techniques. Endo-LIF and non-Endo-LIF minimally invasive surgery displayed comparable results for most back and leg pain or disability outcomes, despite Endo-LIF having been associated with higher disability at late follow-up (versus Open-LIF). No differences were found regarding fusion rates, cage subsidence, or adverse events. Definitive conclusions regarding fusion rate cannot be drawn due to low number of studies and unstandardized fusion definition. center dot Conclusion: Endo-LIF is an effective and safe alternative to conventional lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Evidence shortcomings may be addressed, and future randomized control trials may be performed to compare techniques and to validate results.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 555
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Keorochana, Gun
    Setrkraising, Kitipong
    Woratanarat, Patarawan
    Arirachakaran, Alisara
    Kongtharvonskul, Jatupon
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 41 (03) : 755 - 770
  • [22] Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haibier, Abuduwupuer
    Yusufu, Alimujiang
    Hang, Lin
    Abudurexiti, Tuerhongjiang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [23] The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kumar, Ashutosh
    Sardhara, Jayesh
    Mishra, Prabhaker
    Kapoor, Vishwas
    Mehrotra, Anant
    Raiyani, Vandan
    Singh, Mayank
    Goyal, Nishant
    Kulkarni, Arvind G.
    Srikantha, Umesh
    Bhaisora, Kamlesh Singh
    Das, Kuntal Kanti
    Srivastava, Arun K.
    Behari, Sanjay
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2022, 13 (03) : 245 - 255
  • [24] Outcomes and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Jonathan
    Rabin, Erik E.
    Stricsek, Geoffrey P.
    Swong, Kevin N.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 36 (05) : 741 - 752
  • [25] Comparison of Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Meta-analysis
    Xiao, Shanwen
    Zhou, Shufang
    Pan, Shixin
    Ning, Jinpei
    Gan, Xiutian
    Guan, Yanhua
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (02): : 56 - 66
  • [26] Expandable Versus Static Cages in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Calvachi-Prieto, Paola
    McAvoy, Malia B.
    Cerecedo-Lopez, Christian D.
    Lu, Yi
    Chi, John H.
    Aglio, Linda S.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Gormley, William B.
    Groff, Michael W.
    Mekary, Rania A.
    Zaidi, Hasan A.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 151 : E607 - E614
  • [27] Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion rates performed without posterolateral fusion
    Bevevino, Adam J.
    Kang, Daniel G.
    Lehman, Ronald A., Jr.
    Van Blarcum, Gregory S.
    Wagner, Scott C.
    Gwinn, David E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (10) : 1686 - 1690
  • [28] A comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage material on fusion rates: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Pairojboriboon, Sutipat
    Niruthisard, Supranee
    Chandhanayingyong, Chandhanarat
    Monsereenusorn, Chalinee
    Poopan, Siwaporn
    Lo, Sheng-Fu Larry
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 23
  • [29] Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion enhanced the recovery of patients with the lumbar degenerative disease compared with the conventional posterior procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Honghao
    Cheng, Fengqi
    Hai, Yong
    Liu, Yuzeng
    Pan, Aixing
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [30] Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hao Han
    Yifan Song
    Yiming Li
    Hengcai Zhou
    Yufei Fu
    Jie Li
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18