Characterizing Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients Using a Deep-Learning Model Compared With Radiologists' Analysis of Grayscale Ultrasound and Lymphosonography

被引:0
|
作者
Machado, Priscilla [1 ]
Tahmasebi, Aylin [1 ]
Fallon, Samuel [2 ]
Liu, Ji-Bin [1 ]
Dogan, Basak E. [3 ]
Needleman, Laurence [1 ]
Lazar, Melissa [4 ]
Willis, Alliric I. [4 ]
Brill, Kristin [4 ]
Nazarian, Susanna [4 ]
Berger, Adam [5 ]
Forsberg, Flemming [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol, 132 S 10th St,Main 763M, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Melanoma & Soft Tissue Surg Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; sentinel lymph node; breast cancer; ultrasound; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; INTRADERMAL MICROBUBBLES; BIOPSY; IDENTIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION; MELANOMA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The objective of the study was to use a deep learning model to differentiate between benign and malignant sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer compared to radiologists' assessments. Seventy-nine women with breast cancer were enrolled and underwent lymphosonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination after subcutaneous injection of ultrasound contrast agent around their tumor to identify SLNs. Google AutoML was used to develop image classification model. Grayscale and CEUS images acquired during the ultrasound examination were uploaded with a data distribution of 80% for training/20% for testing. The performance metric used was area under precision/recall curve (AuPRC). In addition, 3 radiologists assessed SLNs as normal or abnormal based on a clinical established classification. Two-hundred seventeen SLNs were divided in 2 for model development; model 1 included all SLNs and model 2 had an equal number of benign and malignant SLNs. Validation results model 1 AuPRC 0.84 (grayscale)/0.91 (CEUS) and model 2 AuPRC 0.91 (grayscale)/0.87 (CEUS). The comparison between artificial intelligence (AI) and readers' showed statistical significant differences between all models and ultrasound modes; model 1 grayscale AI versus readers, P = 0.047, and model 1 CEUS AI versus readers, P < 0.001. Model 2 r grayscale AI versus readers, P = 0.032, and model 2 CEUS AI versus readers, P = 0.041. The interreader agreement overall result showed kappa values of 0.20 for grayscale and 0.17 for CEUS. In conclusion, AutoML showed improved diagnostic performance in balance volume datasets. Radiologist performance was not influenced by the dataset's distribution.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SENTINEL LYMPH NODE IDENTIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER USING LYMPHOSONOGRAPHY
    Machado, Priscilla
    Liu, Ji-Bin
    Needleman, Laurence
    Lazar, Melissa
    Willis, Alliric, I
    Brill, Kristin
    Nazarian, Susanna
    Berger, Adam
    Forsberg, Flemming
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 49 (02) : 616 - 625
  • [2] Sentinel Lymph Node Identification in Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Excision Using Lymphosonography
    Machado, Priscilla
    Liu, Ji-Bin
    Needleman, Laurence
    Lazar, Melissa
    Willis, Alliric I.
    Brill, Kristin
    Nazarian, Susanna
    Berger, Adam
    Forsberg, Flemming
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (07) : 1509 - 1517
  • [3] Prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer by using deep learning radiomics based on ultrasound images
    Wang, Chujun
    Zhao, Yu
    Wan, Min
    Huang, Long
    Liao, Lingmin
    Guo, Liangyun
    Zhang, Jing
    Zhang, Chun-Quan
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (44) : E35868
  • [4] Identification of sentinel lymph node macrometastasis in breast cancer by deep learning based on clinicopathological characteristics
    Zhang, Daqu
    Svensson, Miriam
    Eden, Patrik
    Dihge, Looket
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] Preoperative Sentinel Node Identification With Ultrasound Using Microbubbles in Patients With Breast Cancer
    Sever, Ali R.
    Mills, Philippa
    Jones, Susan E.
    Cox, Karina
    Weeks, Jennifer
    Fish, David
    Jones, Peter A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (02) : 251 - 256
  • [6] The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for sentinel lymph node identification and characterisation in pre-operative breast cancer patients: A prospective study
    Zhao, Jing
    Zhang, Jing
    Zhu, Qing-Li
    Jiang, Yu-Xin
    Sun, Qiang
    Zhou, Yi-Dong
    Wang, Miao-Qian
    Meng, Zhi-Lan
    Mao, Xin-Xin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (04) : 1654 - 1661
  • [7] Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis
    Liu, Xiao
    Wang, Meihuan
    Wang, Qian
    Zhang, Huawei
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 202 (02) : 221 - 231
  • [8] Deep learning to predict breast cancer sentinel lymph node status on INSEMA histological images
    Marme, Frederik
    Krieghoff-Henning, Eva
    Gerber, Bernd
    Schmitt, Max
    Zahm, Dirk -Michael
    Bauerschlag, Dirk
    Forstbauer, Helmut
    Hildebrandt, Guido
    Ataseven, Beyhan
    Brodkorb, Tobias
    Denkert, Carsten
    Stachs, Angrit
    Krug, David
    Heil, Joerg
    Golatta, Michael
    Kuehn, Thorsten
    Nekljudova, Valentina
    Gaiser, Timo
    Schoenmehl, Rebecca
    Brochhausen, Christoph
    Loibl, Sibylle
    Reimer, Toralf
    Brinker, Titus J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 195
  • [9] Quantitative ultrasound image analysis of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients
    Drukker, Karen
    Giger, Maryellen
    Meinel, Lina Arbash
    Starkey, Adam
    Janardanan, Jyothi
    Abe, Hiroyuki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2013, 8 (06) : 895 - 903
  • [10] Current status of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer
    Gang Cheng
    Stephanie Kurita
    Drew A. Torigian
    Abass Alavi
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2011, 38 : 562 - 575