A comparison of postoperative outcomes based on recipient vessels in scalp free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Pekcan, Asli [1 ]
Roohani, Idean [1 ]
Stanton, Eloise [1 ]
Choe, Deborah [1 ]
Tomaro, Micaela [1 ]
Premaratne, Ishani D. [2 ]
Wallace, Langley G. [1 ]
Carey, Joseph N. [1 ,2 ]
Daar, David A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Keck Sch Med USC, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 1520 Pablo St,Suite 4300, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
SUPERFICIAL TEMPORAL ARTERY; ANTEROLATERAL THIGH FLAP; FREE TISSUE TRANSFER; FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION; DEFECTS; VEIN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe superficial temporal artery (STA) and facial artery (FA) are two commonly used recipient vessels when performing free tissue transfer to the head and neck. This meta-analysis compares the impact of recipient vessel location on free flap outcomes in scalp reconstruction.MethodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA-P guidelines using six databases. Studies reporting free tissue transfer using the STA or FA as a recipient vessel for reconstructing scalp defects were included. Outcomes of interest included flap loss, partial flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, venous thrombosis, and infection rates. Quality evaluation was performed using ASPS criteria and the ROBINS-I tool.ResultsOf 3270 identified articles, 12 were included for final analysis. In total, 125 free flaps were identified (75 STA, 50 FA). Pooled analysis demonstrated an overall flap survival rate of 98.4% (STA 98.7% vs. FA 98.0%; p = .782). The mean defect size was significantly greater for flaps using the STA compared with the FA (223.7 +/- 119.4 cm2 vs. 157.1 +/- 96.5 cm2, p = .001). The FA group had a higher incidence of wound dehiscence than the STA group (14.0% vs. 1.3%, p = .005). However, meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in rates of wound dehiscence, flap loss, partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, or postoperative infection between groups.ConclusionThis is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess recipient vessel selection in scalp reconstruction. Our results do not support a single vessel as the superior choice in scalp reconstruction. Rather, these findings suggest that the decision between using the STA or FA is multifaceted, requiring a flexible approach that considers the individual characteristics of each case. Further research is needed to explore additional factors influencing recipient vessel selection, including defect location, radiation therapy, and prior head and neck surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Reconstruction of extensive scalp defects with anterolateral thigh flap
    Altinkaya, Altug
    Yazar, Sukru
    Saglam, Ibrahim
    Gideroglu, Kaan
    [J]. ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2018, 24 (04): : 364 - 368
  • [2] Flaps pedicled on the superficial temporal artery and vein in facial reconstruction: A versatile option with a venous pitfall
    Ausen, Kjersti
    Pavlovic, Ivan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2011, 45 (4-5) : 178 - 187
  • [3] Superficial Temporal Recipient Vessels for Craniofacial Microvascular Free-Flaps
    Awwad, Lina
    Obed, Doha
    Vogt, Peter M.
    Kaltenborn, Alexander
    Koenneker, Soeren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (06) : E652 - E657
  • [4] USE OF FREE LATISSIMUS DORSI MUSCULOCUTANEOUS FLAPS IN VARIOUS NEUROSURGICAL DISORDERS
    BARROW, DL
    NAHAI, F
    FLEISCHER, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1983, 58 (02) : 252 - 258
  • [5] Reconstruction of Complex Scalp Defects in Different Locations: Suggestions for Puzzle
    Bas, Soysal
    Oner, Cagatay
    Eren, Hikmet Ihsan
    Karsidag, Semra Hacikerim
    Yilmaz, Adem
    [J]. MEDICAL BULLETIN OF SISLI ETFAL HOSPITAL, 2021, 55 (03): : 349 - 358
  • [6] Reconstruction of the Forehead and Scalp
    Bradford, Benjamin D.
    Lee, Judy W.
    [J]. FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 27 (01) : 85 - +
  • [7] RETRACTED: Treatment of Large and Complicated Scalp Defects with Free Flap Transfer (Retracted Article)
    Chen, Fanfan
    Ju, Hongbin
    Huang, Anfei
    Yi, Yongjun
    Cao, Yongfu
    Xie, Wei
    Wang, Xinliang
    Fu, Guo
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
  • [8] An Algorithm for Recipient Vessel Selection in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Chia, Hui-Ling
    Wong, Chin-Ho
    Tan, Bien-Keem
    Tan, Kok-Chai
    Ong, Yee-Siang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2011, 27 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [9] Salvage of postcranioplasty implant exposure using free tissue transfer
    Chou, Pang-Yun
    Lin, Cheng-Hung
    Hsu, Chung-Chen
    Yang, Wei-Hsun
    Kane, Alex A.
    Lin, Chih-Hung
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2017, 39 (08): : 1655 - 1661
  • [10] Superficial Temporal Artery and Vein as Recipient Vessels for Scalp and Facial Reconstruction: Radiographic Support for Underused Vessels
    Doscher, Matthew
    Charafeddine, Ali H.
    Schiff, Bradley A.
    Miller, Todd
    Smith, Richard V.
    Tepper, Oren
    Garfein, Evan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2015, 31 (04) : 249 - 253