Usability Testing: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on WoS Data

被引:0
作者
Baghini, Mahdie Shojaei [1 ]
Mohammadi, Mehdi [1 ]
Norouzkhani, Narges [2 ]
机构
[1] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Inst Futures Studies Hlth, Med Informat Res Ctr, Informat Management, Kerman, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Med Informat, Mashhad, Iran
关键词
User-Centered Design; Usability Testing; Bibliometric Analysis; Citation Analysis; Bibliometric Mapping; KEYWORDS PLUS; CO-AUTHORSHIP; SCIENCE; WEB;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Usability is a qualitative characteristic that evaluates the ease of use of user interfaces. This study aims to conduct a systematic bibliometric analysis of usability testing and to understand the research context and trends in this field. A total of 5273 scientific publications from the Web of Science core collection were included in the study. Performance analysis, scientific mapping, and visualization were done using the RStudio package and the VOSviewer software tool. The results show that the interest in the area of usability testing has significantly increased, especially from 1991 to 2022. The United States has the highest number of publications, citations, co-citations, and ratios. Toronto University was top in terms of institutional contributions. The JMIR mHealth and uHealth led in the number of publications and citations. Khajouei has the highest number of publications, but Jaspers has received the most citations on usability testing. With 10264 total link strength, Nielsen has the most potent co-citation papers. This study reveals the latest research trends and hotspots and the current state of international collaboration in usability testing research, to indicate the most influential research channels. These findings include; the prominent countries, institutions, journals, original articles, and authors. To the best of the author's knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to conduct the bibliometric analysis on usability testing. These findings can be useful in shaping the direction of future studies on usability testing, and the understanding how usability testing.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 24
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
[11]  
Carayon Pascale, 2019, Yearb Med Inform, V28, P71, DOI 10.1055/s-0039-1677907
[12]   Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact [J].
Carpenter, Christopher R. ;
Cone, David C. ;
Sarli, Cathy C. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (10) :1160-1172
[13]  
Clarivate, 2022, KeyWords Plus generation, creation, and changes
[14]  
Coiera E, 2016, Yearb Med Inform, P163
[15]  
Collection C. WEB OF SCIENCE CORE COLLECTION (W of Science), 2022, Web Sci
[16]  
Collection W of SC, 2021, Web of Science Core Collection Overview
[17]   Gut Health in Veterinary Medicine: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature [J].
Colombino, Elena ;
Prieto-Botella, Daniel ;
Capucchio, Maria Teresa .
ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (07)
[18]   Issues in the analysis of co-authorship networks [J].
De Stefano, Domenico ;
Giordano, Giuseppe ;
Vitale, Maria Prosperina .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2011, 45 (05) :1091-1107
[19]   Social Media in General Education: A Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science from 2005-2021 [J].
Dinh-Hai Luong ;
Xuan-An Nguyen ;
Thanh-Thuy Ngo ;
My-Ngoc Tran ;
Hong-Lien Nguyen .
JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRIC RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (03) :680-690
[20]   How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines [J].
Donthu, Naveen ;
Kumar, Satish ;
Mukherjee, Debmalya ;
Pandey, Nitesh ;
Lim, Weng Marc .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 133 :285-296