Beyond probability-impact matrices in project risk management: A quantitative methodology for risk prioritisation

被引:8
作者
Acebes, F. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Varona, J. M. [2 ]
Lopez-Paredes, A. [2 ]
Pajares, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Escuela Ingn Ind, GIR INSISOC, Dept Org Empresas & CIM, Po Prado Magdalena s-n, Valladolid 47011, Spain
[2] Univ Malaga, GIR INSISOC, Dept Econ & Adm Empresas, Avda Cervantes 2, Malaga 29071, Spain
来源
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
COST; UNCERTAINTY; UTILITY; TIME;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-024-03180-5
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The project managers who deal with risk management are often faced with the difficult task of determining the relative importance of the various sources of risk that affect the project. This prioritisation is crucial to direct management efforts to ensure higher project profitability. Risk matrices are widely recognised tools by academics and practitioners in various sectors to assess and rank risks according to their likelihood of occurrence and impact on project objectives. However, the existing literature highlights several limitations to use the risk matrix. In response to the weaknesses of its use, this paper proposes a novel approach for prioritising project risks. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) is used to perform a quantitative prioritisation of risks with the simulation software MCSimulRisk. Together with the definition of project activities, the simulation includes the identified risks by modelling their probability and impact on cost and duration. With this novel methodology, a quantitative assessment of the impact of each risk is provided, as measured by the effect that it would have on project duration and its total cost. This allows the differentiation of critical risks according to their impact on project duration, which may differ if cost is taken as a priority objective. This proposal is interesting for project managers because they will, on the one hand, know the absolute impact of each risk on their project duration and cost objectives and, on the other hand, be able to discriminate the impacts of each risk independently on the duration objective and the cost objective.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Quantitative risk analysis using "MCSimulRisk" as a teaching tool [J].
Acebes, F. ;
Curto, D. ;
de Anton, J. ;
Villafanez, F. .
DIRECCION Y ORGANIZACION, 2024, 82 :87-99
[2]  
Acebes F, 2023, IoT and Data Science in Engineering Management, V160, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-27915-78
[3]   Stochastic earned value analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and statistical learning techniques [J].
Acebes, Fernando ;
Pereda, Maria ;
Poza, David ;
Pajares, Javier ;
Manuel Galan, Jose .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (07) :1597-1609
[4]   A new approach for project control under uncertainty. Going back to the basics [J].
Acebes, Fernando ;
Pajares, Javier ;
Manuel Galan, Jose ;
Lopez-Paredes, Adolfo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 32 (03) :423-434
[5]   A unique Markov chain Monte Carlo method for forecasting wind power utilizing time series model [J].
Al-Duais, Fuad S. ;
Al-Sharpi, Razaz S. .
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 74 :51-63
[6]   On the origin of PCDS - (Probability consequence diagrams) [J].
Ale, Ben ;
Burnap, Pete ;
Slater, David .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 72 :229-239
[7]  
Alleman G.B., 2018, COLL PERF MANAG MEAS, VNews, P27
[8]  
ALLEMAN G.B., 2018, The Measurable News, V01, P25
[9]   Appropriate budget contingency determination for construction projects: State-of-the-art [J].
Ammar, Taher ;
Abdel-Monem, Mohamed ;
El-Dash, Karim .
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 78 :88-103
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2021, A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide), V7th