Review of studies on target acquisition in virtual reality based on the crossing paradigm

被引：1
作者：
HUANG S. [1 ]
QI D. [2 ]
YUAN J. [1 ]
TU H. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
[2] Jiangsu Hongao Mdt InfoTech Co., Ltd., Lianyungang, Jiangsu
来源：
Virtual Reality and Intelligent Hardware | 2019年 / 1卷 / 03期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词：
Crossing paradigm; Pointing paradigm; Target selection; Virtual reality;
D O I：
10.3724/SP.J.2096-5796.2019.0006
中图分类号：
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号：
0812 ;
摘要：
Crossing is a fundamental paradigm for target selection in human-computer interaction systems. This paradigm was first introduced to virtual reality (VR) interactions by Tu et al., who investigated its performance in comparison to pointing, and concluded that crossing is generally no less effective than pointing and has unique advantages. However, owing to the characteristics of VR interactions, there are still many factors to consider when applying crossing to a VR environment. Thus, this review summarizes the main techniques for object selection in VR and crossing-related studies. Then, factors that may affect crossing interactions are analyzed from the perspectives of the input space and visual space. The aim of this study is to provide a reference for future studies on target selection based on the crossing paradigm in virtual reality. © 2019 Beijing Zhongke Journal Publishing Co. Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码：251 / 264
页数：13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Tu H.W., Huang S.S., Yuan J.B., Ren X.S., Tian F., Crossing-based selection with virtual reality head-mounted displays, Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2019)
  • [2] Argelaguet F., Andujar C., A survey of 3D object selection techniques for virtual environments, Computers & Graphics, 37, 3, pp. 121-136, (2013)
  • [3] Grossman T., Balakrishnan R., The design and evaluation of selection techniques for 3D volumetric displays, Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, (2006)
  • [4] Steinicke F., Ropinski T., Hinrichs K., Object selection in virtual environments using an improved virtual pointer metaphor//Computational Imaging and Vision, pp. 320-326, (2006)
  • [5] Cournia N., Smith J.D., Duchowski A.T., Gaze- vs. hand-based pointing in virtual environments, Human factors in computing systems, (2003)
  • [6] Vanacken L., Grossman T., Coninx K., Exploring the effects of environment density and target visibility on object selection in 3D virtual environments, 2007 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, (2007)
  • [7] Poupyrev I., Billinghurst M., Weghorst S., Ichikawa T., The go-go interaction technique, Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, (1996)
  • [8] Zhai S., Buxton W., Milgram P.
  • [9] Grossman T., Balakrishnan R., Kurtenbach G., Fitzmaurice G., Khan A., Creating principal 3D curves with digital tape drawing, (2002)
  • [10] Bowman D.A., Johnson D.B., Hodges L.F., Testbed evaluation of virtual environment interaction techniques, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10, 1, pp. 75-95, (2001)
123456