Chasing the objective upper eyelid symmetry formula; R2, RMSE, POC, MAE, and MSE

被引:3
作者
Cabuk, Kubra Serefoglu [1 ]
Cengiz, Said Kemal [2 ]
Guler, Mehmet Guray [3 ]
Topcu, Husna [4 ]
Efe, Ayse Cetin [4 ]
Ulas, Mehmet Goksel [4 ]
Karademir, Fatma Poslu [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Basaksehir Cam & Sakura City Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, TR-34480 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Def Technol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Management, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Univ Hlth Sci Beyoglu Eye Hosp, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
MAE; MSE; POC; R-2; RMSE; Symmetry; Upper eyelid; LID CONTOUR; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-024-03157-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose Investigate the most appropriate mathematical formula to objectively express upper eyelid contour symmetry. Methods 62 eyes of 31 patients were included in the study. The upper eyelid contour symmetry of the patients was classified subjectively (independent of MRD1) as poor, acceptable, and good by three oculoplastic specialists (senior, expert, and junior surgeon). B & eacute;zier curves of the upper lid contour were drawn with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MA, USA). Using the algorithms created by Author SKC in Spyder (Python 3.7.9.), the symmetry of the B & eacute;zier curves of the left eyelids were obtained according to the y-axis, and the mid-pupils of both eyes were superimposed. The lower curve moved vertically to the equal height of the other curve to equalize MRD1's. R-2 (Coefficient of determination), RMSE (Root-mean-square error), MSE (Mean squared error), POC (Percentage of co-efficiency), and MAE (Mean absolute error) were calculated. We evaluated the correlation between these objective formulas and the subjective grading of three surgeons using Spearman's rho (rho). Results The correlation coefficient of RMSE and MSE were the same for all surgeons grading. There was a strong correlation between the senior surgeon's subjective scoring (N; poor = 8, acceptable = 16, good = 8) and R-2, RMSE, POC, MAE (rho = 0.643, p < 0.001, rho = -0.607, p < 0.001, rho = 0.562, p < 0.001, rho = -0.517, p < 0.001, respectively). We found a strong relationship between the expert surgeon's subjective scoring (N; poor = 9, acceptable = 13, good:10) and R-2 (rho = 0.611, p < 0.001), RMSE (rho = -0.549, p < 0.001), POC (rho = 0.511, p < 0.001), and MAE (rho = -0.450, p < 0.05). We found a strong correlation between junior surgeon's subjective scoring (N; poor = 6, acceptable = 18, good = 8) and R-2, RMSE, and POC (rho: -0.517, p < 0.001; rho: -0.470, p < 0.001; rho: 0.521, p < 0.001; respectively) and moderate correlation between MAE (rho:-0.394, p < 0.05). The highest correlation is observed with R-2. Conclusions RMSE, MSE, POC, MAE, and especially R-2, may quantitatively express upper eyelid contour symmetry, comparable with the oculoplastic surgeon. The highest correlation was observed between the senior surgeon and R-2, and decreases with the experience of the surgeon.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Analysis of Surgical Outcome After Levator Advancement by Assessing Changes in Eyelid Contour
    Ahn, Somin
    Lee, Hwa
    Lee, Joonsik
    Park, Jinhwan
    Park, Minsoo
    Baek, Sehyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 27 (05) : 1147 - 1150
  • [2] Symmetry of Upper Eyelid Contour After Unilateral Blepharoptosis Repair With a Single-strip Frontalis Suspension Technique
    Akaishi, Patricia
    Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
    Cruz, Antonio A. V.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 34 (05) : 436 - 439
  • [3] Comparing the symmetry of upper eyelid following unilateral ptosis correction
    Aytogan, Hasan
    Ayintap, Emre
    [J]. BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] Muller muscle conjunctival resection or external levator advancement; a quantitative comparison of symmetry in unilateral ptosis *
    Cabuk, Kubra Serefoglu
    Nacaroglu, Senay Asik
    Karabulut, Gamze Ozturk
    Fazil, Korhan
    Arslan, Mehmet Selcuk
    Guler, Mehmet Guray
    Taskapili, Muhittin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) : 2125 - 2132
  • [5] Eyelid Contour Following Conjunctival Mllerectomy With or Without Tarsectomy Blepharoptosis Repair
    Choudhary, Maria M.
    Chundury, Rao
    McNutt, Stephen A.
    Perry, Julian D.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 32 (05) : 361 - 365
  • [6] Topographic analysis of eyelid position using digital image processing software
    Chun, Yeoun Sook
    Park, Hong Hyun
    Park, In Ki
    Moon, Nam Ju
    Park, Sang Joon
    Lee, Jeong Kyu
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2017, 95 (07) : E625 - E632
  • [7] Digital image processing measurement of the upper eyelid contour in Graves disease and congenital blepharoptosis
    Cruz, AAV
    Coelho, RP
    Baccega, A
    Lucchezi, MC
    Souza, ADA
    Ruiz, EES
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (05) : 913 - 918
  • [8] A novel technique for the measurement of eyelid contour to compare outcomes following Muller's muscle-conjunctival resection and external levator resection surgery
    Danesh, Jennifer
    Ugradar, Shoaib
    Goldberg, Robert
    Rootman, Daniel B.
    [J]. EYE, 2018, 32 (09) : 1493 - 1497
  • [9] Digital Image Analysis to Characterize the Upper Lid Marginal Peak After Levator Aponeurosis Repair
    Flynn, Thomas H.
    Rose, Geoffrey E.
    Shah-Desai, Sabrina D.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 27 (01) : 12 - 14
  • [10] Contour Symmetry of the Upper Eyelid Following Bilateral Conjunctival-Muller's Muscle Resection
    Golbert, Marcelo
    Pereira, Filipe Jose
    Garcia, Denny M.
    Cruz, Antonio A. V.
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2017, 37 (03) : 269 - 275