Hybrid hierarchical fuzzy group decision-making based on information axioms and BWM: Prototype design selection

被引:13
作者
Ijadi Maghsoodi A. [1 ]
Mosavat M. [2 ]
Hafezalkotob A. [3 ]
Hafezalkotob A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Industrial Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hesarak, Tehran
[2] Department of Industrial Design, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Enghelab St, Tehran
[3] College of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Entezari Aly, Oskoui St, Choobi Brg, Tehran
[4] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Entezari Aly, Oskoui St, Choobi Brg, Tehran
关键词
Best-Worst Method (BWM); Fuzzy Axiomatic Design (FAD); Fuzzy sets; Group decision-making; Loudspeaker prototype selection; Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM);
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.018
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The selection of the optimal conceptual design of any product is challenging due to the complexity of the customer's behavior and the competitiveness existing among production companies. The present study introduces a hierarchical group decision-making algorithm supported on Axiomatic Design principles and Best-Worst Method under fuzzy environment. A case study on the selection of conceptual prototype design for a loudspeaker is analyzed using the proposed approach. By employing the proposed hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, an optimal conceptual prototype design is selected among four candidate loudspeaker designs considering the problem criteria including inclusive design elements and aesthetic factors as well as environmental and sustainability issues. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:788 / 804
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Fuzzy vikor as a resolution for multicriteria group decision-making [J].
Wang, TC ;
Chang, TH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2: INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY, 2005, :352-356
[22]   A GROUP DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANS SELECTION BASED ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS [J].
Zhou, Zhexuan ;
Dou, Yajie ;
Zhang, Xiaoxiong ;
Zhao, Danling ;
Tan, Yuejin .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 26 (04) :251-260
[23]   Alternative ranking based on fuzzy similarity in group decision-making [J].
Guo Q. ;
Guo Y. ;
Guo C. .
Xinan Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 45 (02) :307-311
[24]   Group decision-making based on pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method [J].
Akram, Muhammad ;
Dudek, Wieslaw A. ;
Ilyas, Farwa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (07) :1455-1475
[25]   A hybrid least square method for group decision-making problem based on fuzzy preference relations [J].
Xu, ZS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, :625-629
[26]   A new ELECTRE-based method for group decision-making with complex spherical fuzzy information [J].
Zahid, Kiran ;
Akram, Muhammad ;
Kahraman, Cengiz .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2022, 243
[27]   A new compromise solution method for fuzzy group decision-making problems with an application to the contractor selection [J].
Vahdani, Behnam ;
Mousavi, S. Meysam ;
Hashemi, H. ;
Mousakhani, M. ;
Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 26 (02) :779-788
[28]   Multi-adjoint based group decision-making under an intuitionistic fuzzy information system [J].
Liang, Meishe ;
Mi, Jusheng ;
Feng, Tao ;
Xie, Bin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2019, 12 (01) :172-182
[29]   Multi-adjoint based group decision-making under an intuitionistic fuzzy information system [J].
Meishe Liang ;
Jusheng Mi ;
Tao Feng ;
Bin Xie .
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2018, 12 (1) :172-182
[30]   A Dynamic Emergency Decision-Making Method Based on Group Decision Making with Uncertainty Information [J].
Zheng, Jing ;
Wang, Yingming ;
Zhang, Kai ;
Liang, Juan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (05) :667-679