Perspectives on the essential skills of healthcare decision making in children and adolescents with intellectual disability

被引:1
作者
Downs, Jenny [1 ,2 ]
Keeley, Jessica [1 ]
Skoss, Rachel [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Mills, Jaquie [5 ]
Nevill, Thom [1 ]
Schippers, Alice [6 ]
Lindly, Olivia [7 ]
Thompson, Sandra [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Telethon Kids Inst, Ctr Child Hlth Res, Perth, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Curtin Sch Allied Hlth, Perth, Australia
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Inst Hlth Res, Fremantle, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Perth, Australia
[5] Microboards Australia, Perth, Australia
[6] Univ Humanist Studies, Dept Care Ethi, Disabil Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands
[7] No Arizona Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Flagstaff, AZ USA
[8] Univ Western Australia, Western Australian Ctr Rural Hlth, Geraldton, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Intellectual disability; Health literacy; Shared decision making; Supported decision making; Disability Royal Commission; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DEVELOPMENTAL-DISABILITIES; GENERAL HEALTH; POPULATION; PATIENT; COMPETENCE; PREVALENCE; FRAMEWORK; LITERACY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12939-024-02204-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Involvement in healthcare decisions is associated with better health outcomes for patients. For children and adolescents with intellectual disability, parents and healthcare professionals need to balance listening to a child's wishes with the responsibility of keeping them safe. However, there is a scarcity of literature evaluating how to effectively involve them in decision making. In this context, we review the concept of health literacy, focusing on the skills of healthcare decision making for children and adolescents with intellectual disability.Methods We describe the concept of health literacy and models explaining shared decision making (individuals and healthcare professionals collaborate in decision making process) and supported decision making (when a trusted person supports the individual to collaborate with the healthcare professional in the decision-making process), and a rapid review of the literature evaluating their efficacy. We discuss healthcare decision making for children and adolescents with intellectual disability in the context of relevant recommendations from the recent Disability Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation of People with Disability in Australia.Results Health literacy skills enable individuals to access, understand, appraise, remember and use health information and services. Shared decision making has been described for children with chronic conditions and supported decision making for adults with intellectual disability. Decision-making contributes to how individuals appraise and use healthcare. The rapid review found very limited evidence of outcomes where children and adolescents with intellectual disability have been supported to contribute to their healthcare decisions. Recommendations from the Disability Royal Commission highlight current needs for greater efforts to support and build the capacity of individuals with disability to be involved in the decisions that affect their life, including healthcare decision making.Conclusions Existing rights frameworks and healthcare standards confirm the importance of providing all people with the opportunities to learn and practise health literacy skills including decision making. There is little literature examining interventions for healthcare decision making for children with intellectual disability. Childhood is a critical time for the development of skills and autonomy. Evidence for how children and adolescents with intellectual disability can learn and practice healthcare decision-making skills in preparation for adulthood is needed to reduce inequities in their autonomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Shared Decision-Making and Children With Disabilities: Pathways to Consensus
    Adams, Richard C.
    Levy, Susan E.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2017, 139 (06)
  • [2] IN THE GENES OR IN THE STARS - CHILDRENS COMPETENCE TO CONSENT
    ALDERSON, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1992, 18 (03) : 119 - 124
  • [3] Arstein-Kerslake A, 2017, Disabil Stud Q, P37
  • [4] Australian Commission on Safety, 2021, and Quality in Health Care: National safety and quality health service standards
  • [5] Hospitalisation rates for ambulatory care sensitive conditions for persons with and without an intellectual disability-a population perspective
    Balogh, R.
    Brownell, M.
    Ouellette-Kuntz, H.
    Colantonio, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2010, 54 : 820 - 832
  • [6] Bates K., 2021, Educational Child Psychol, V38, P124, DOI [10.53841/bpsecp.2021.38.3.124, DOI 10.53841/BPSECP.2021.38.3.124]
  • [7] Health literacy: applying current concepts to improve health services and reduce health inequalities
    Batterham, R. W.
    Hawkins, M.
    Collins, P. A.
    Buchbinder, R.
    Osborne, R. H.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 132 : 3 - 12
  • [8] Bebbington A, 2013, BMJ Open, P3
  • [9] "I used to call him a non-decision-maker-I never do that anymore": parental reflections about training to support decision-making of their adult offspring with intellectual disabilities
    Bigby, Christine
    Douglas, Jacinta
    Smith, Elizabeth
    Carney, Terry
    Then, Shih-Ning
    Wiesel, Ilan
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (21) : 6356 - 6364
  • [10] Prevalence estimates of mental health problems in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buckley, Nicholas
    Glasson, Emma J.
    Chen, Wai
    Epstein, Amy
    Leonard, Helen
    Skoss, Rachel
    Jacoby, Peter
    Blackmore, Amanda Marie
    Srinivasjois, Ravisha
    Bourke, Jenny
    Sanders, Richard J.
    Downs, Jenny
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 54 (10) : 970 - 984