Thriving from work questionnaire: German translation and validation

被引:0
作者
Neidlinger, Stephanie M. [1 ,2 ]
Peters, Susan E. [2 ]
Gundersen, Daniel A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Felfe, Joerg [1 ]
机构
[1] Helmut Schmidt Univ, Dept Work Org & Business Psychol, D-22043 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Work Hlth & Well Being, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Rutgers Inst Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[4] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Div Gen Internal Med, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
Questionnaires; Worker well-being; Item response theory; Study validation; Germany; BIFACTOR; MODELS;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-024-19037-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The Thriving from Work questionnaire is a comprehensive indicator of positive well-being for employees, applicable in both research and practical contexts. Current discussions underline the crucial impact that employment should have in enriching workers' lives positively and meaningfully, along with the necessity for accurate and dependable tools to assess employee well-being. This study investigated the reliability, validity, and dimensionality of the translated German adaptation of the Thriving from Work questionnaire developed by Peters and colleagues [1, 2]. The questionnaire assesses work-related well-being with 30 items clustered in six domains: emotional and psychological well-being, social well-being, work-life integration, physical and mental well-being, basic needs for thriving, and experiences of work.Methods This study aimed to convert the Thriving at Work Questionnaire from English into German. We assessed the psychometric characteristics of the German version of the questionnaire by using item response theory with a sample of 567 German employees and examined its criterion validity.Results We found that the long and short German Thriving from Work questionnaire versions are reliable with good construct validity. Criterion validity was demonstrated by relationships with important work and life outcomes, such as life satisfaction, trust in the organizations' management, general well-being, work-related fatigue, and work stress.Conclusions The current study demonstrated that the German language version of the questionnaire is both a reliable and valid measure of employee well-being. We discuss recommendations for further adaptation and future research.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] Well-Being and Trust in the Workplace
    Helliwell, John F.
    Huang, Haifang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2011, 12 (05) : 747 - 767
  • [12] The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree
    Lai, Keke
    Green, Samuel B.
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2016, 51 (2-3) : 220 - 239
  • [13] Landy F.J., 1994, International Journal of Stress Management, V1, P33, DOI [10.1007/BF01857282, DOI 10.1007/BF01857282]
  • [14] A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation
    Lyubomirsky, S
    Lepper, HS
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1999, 46 (02) : 137 - 155
  • [15] McNeish D, 2023, arXiv
  • [16] A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework for the Identification of Distinct Sources of Construct-Relevant Psychometric Multidimensionality
    Morin, Alexandre J. S.
    Arens, A. Katrin
    Marsh, Herbert W.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (01) : 116 - 139
  • [17] NIOSH, 2021, NIOSH worker well-being questionnaire (WellBQ)
  • [18] Nubling Matthias, 2006, Psychosoc Med, V3, pDoc05
  • [19] Pavot W., 2008, J F POSITIVE PSYCHOL, V3, P137
  • [20] Peters SE, 2024, BMC Public Health