Theory-Practice Divide: Pre-service Teachers' Application of Pedagogical Knowledge During Teaching Practicum

被引:0
作者
Sathasivam, Renuka, V [1 ]
Abdullah, Mohd Nor Syahrir [1 ]
Rauf, Rose Amnah Abd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Educ, Dept Math & Sci Educ, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
来源
PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES | 2024年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词
Pre-service teachers; pedagogical knowledge; teaching practicum; theory-practice divide; TRANSFER CLIMATE; EDUCATION; CHALLENGES; PROGRAM; MENTOR; SKILLS;
D O I
10.47836/pjssh.32.1.04
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Good teacher education programmes ensure good resonance between the pedagogical knowledge learned at the university and the teaching practical. However, the literature shows a significant gap between these two elements. This theory-practice divide can dishearten and potentially jeopardise pre -service teachers' ability to remain in the field. This study investigated pre -service teachers' experiences applying pedagogical knowledge learned at the university to their teaching practicum. The research aims to answer two research questions: (i) what pedagogical knowledge learned at the university was useful or inadequate during teaching practicum, and (ii) what suggestions do they have to reduce the theory-practice divide? An exploratory qualitative research design was employed. The sample consisted of seven pre -service teachers who had recently completed their teaching practicum. The main data sources were an open-ended questionnaire and online interview sessions. Data analysis used a constant comparative method to look for emerging themes. Two themes emerged regarding the first research question: (i) Useful Pedagogical Knowledge and (ii) Inadequate Pedagogical Knowledge. For the former, three categories identified were (i) general teaching methods, (ii) research -based teaching findings, and (iii) sharing of teaching experiences and modelling by lecturers. In the latter, four categories coded were (i) classroom management, (ii) online classes, (iii) completing official forms and (iv) comprehensive lesson plan. Accordingly, the pre -service teachers provided three suggestions to improve these adequacies. The study's implications indicate metaconversations among stakeholders for more holistic programmes and as starting grounds for curriculum reviews.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 86
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Abas M.C., 2016, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, V5, P101, DOI DOI 10.11591/IJERE.V5I2.4528
[2]   Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum [J].
Allen, Jeanne Maree ;
Wright, Suzie Elizabeth .
TEACHERS AND TEACHING, 2014, 20 (02) :136-151
[3]   Being a teacher and teacher educator: The antecedents of teacher educator identity among mentor teachers [J].
Andreasen, J. K. ;
Bjorndal, C. R. P. ;
Kovac, V. B. .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2019, 85 :281-291
[4]  
Atay D., 2008, ELT J, V62, P139, DOI DOI 10.1093/ELT/CCL053
[5]  
Bainbridge A., 2011, Cliopsy, V6, P25, DOI [DOI 10.3917/CLIOP.006.0025, 10.3917/cliop.006.0025]
[6]   Professors and the practicum - Involvement of university faculty in preservice practicum supervision [J].
Beck, C ;
Kosnik, C .
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2002, 53 (01) :6-19
[7]  
Buchanan R., 2020, Journal of Educational Supervision, V3, P76, DOI DOI 10.31045/JES.3.1.6
[8]  
Buchanan R., 2018, Research on teacher identity, P195, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-93836-317, DOI 10.1177/1086296X18784336]
[9]  
Buchanan R., 2017, Doctoral dissertation
[10]  
Clift R. T, 2009, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education, P816