Reducing prostate biopsies and magnetic resonance imaging with prostate cancer risk stratification

被引:10
作者
Davik, Petter [1 ,2 ]
Remmers, Sebastiaan [3 ]
Elschot, Mattijs [4 ,5 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [3 ]
Bathen, Tone Frost [4 ,5 ]
Bertilsson, Helena [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Clin & Mol Med, Trondheim, Norway
[2] St Olavs Hosp, Dept Urol, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Circulat & Med Imaging, Trondheim, Norway
[5] St Olavs Hosp, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Trondheim, Norway
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
biopsy; European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculators (ERSPC RCs); magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; prediction model; prostate cancer; risk calculator; risk stratification; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; PREDICTION; ERSPC; COMPLICATIONS; ACCURACY; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.146
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To recalibrate and validate the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculators (ERSPC RCs) 3/4 and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ERSPC-RCs to a contemporary Norwegian setting to reduce upfront prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and prostate biopsies. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively identified and entered all men who underwent prostate mpMRI and subsequent prostate biopsy between January 2016 and March 2017 in a Norwegian centre into a database. mpMRI was reported using PI-RADS v2.0 and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as Gleason >= 3+4. Probabilities of csPCa and any prostate cancer (PCa) on biopsy were calculated by the ERSPC RCs 3/4 and the MRI-ERSPC-RC and compared with biopsy results. RCs were then recalibrated to account for differences in prevalence between the development and current cohorts (if indicated), and calibration, discrimination and clinical usefulness assessed. Results: Three hundred and three patients were included. The MRI-ERSPC-RCs were perfectly calibrated to our cohort, although the ERSPC RCs 3/4 needed recalibration. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the ERSPC RCs 3/4 was 0.82 for the discrimination of csPCa and 0.77 for any PCa. The AUC for the MRI-ERSPC-RCs was 0.89 for csPCa and 0.85 for any PCa. Decision curve analysis showed clear net benefit for both the ERSPC RCs 3/4 (>2% risk of csPCa threshold to biopsy) and for the MRI-ERSPC-RCs (>1% risk of csPCa threshold), with a greater net benefit for the MRI-RCs. Using a >10% risk of csPCa or 20% risk of any PCa threshold for the ERSPC RCs 3/4, 15.5% of mpMRIs could be omitted, missing 0.8% of csPCa. Using the MRI-ERSPC-RCs, 23.4% of biopsies could be omitted with the same threshold, missing 0.8% of csPCa. Conclusion: The ERSPC RCs 3/4 and MRI-ERSPC-RCs can considerably reduce both upfront mpMRI and prostate biopsies with little risk of missing csPCa.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 353
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[2]   Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators [J].
Alberts, Arnout R. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Verbeek, Jan F. M. ;
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Chiu, Peter K. ;
Osses, Daniel F. ;
Tijsterman, Jasper D. ;
Beerlage, Harrie P. ;
Mannaerts, Christophe K. ;
Schimmoeller, Lars ;
Albers, Peter ;
Arsov, Christian .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (02) :310-318
[3]   Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy [J].
Borghesi, Marco ;
Ahmed, Hashim ;
Nam, Robert ;
Schaeffer, Edward ;
Schiavina, Riccardo ;
Taneja, Samir ;
Weidner, Wolfgang ;
Loeb, Stacy .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (03) :353-365
[4]   Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators: A Performance Comparison in a Contemporary Screened Cohort [J].
Cavadas, Vitor ;
Osorio, Luis ;
Sabell, Francisco ;
Teves, Frederico ;
Branco, Frederico ;
Silva-Ramos, Miguel .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (04) :551-558
[5]   The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction [J].
Distler, Florian A. ;
Radtke, Jan P. ;
Bonekamp, David ;
Kesch, Claudia ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Wieczorek, Kathrin ;
Kirchner, Marietta ;
Pahernik, Sascha ;
Hohenfellner, Markus ;
Hadaschikk, Boris A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03) :575-582
[6]   Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer [J].
Drost, Frank-Jan H. ;
Osses, Daniel F. ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Schoots, Ivo G. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (04)
[7]   The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Allsbrook, WC ;
Amin, MB ;
Egevad, LL ;
Bastacky, S ;
Beltrán, AL ;
Berner, A ;
Billis, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Cheng, L ;
Civantos, F ;
Cohen, C ;
Cohen, MB ;
Datta, M ;
Davis, C ;
Delahunt, B ;
Delprado, W ;
Eble, JN ;
Foster, CS ;
Furusato, M ;
Gaudin, PB ;
Grignon, DJ ;
Humphrey, PA ;
Iczkowski, KA ;
Jones, EC ;
Lucia, S ;
McCue, PA ;
Nazeer, T ;
Oliva, E ;
Pan, CC ;
Pizov, G ;
Reuter, V ;
Samaratunga, H ;
Sebo, T ;
Sesterhenn, I ;
Shevchuk, M ;
Srigley, JR ;
Suzigan, S ;
Takahashi, H ;
Tamboli, P ;
Tan, PH ;
Têtu, B ;
Tickoo, S ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Troncoso, P ;
Tsuzuki, T ;
True, LD ;
van der Kwast, T ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Wojno, KJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) :1228-1242
[8]   Prediction of Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the ERSPC Risk Calculator in a Contemporary Dutch Clinical Cohort [J].
Gayet, Maudy ;
Mannaerts, Christophe K. ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Beerlage, Harrie P. ;
Wijkstra, Hessel ;
Mulders, Peter F. A. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (02) :228-234
[9]   Antibiotic resistance, hospitalizations, and mortality related to prostate biopsy: first report from the Norwegian Patient Registry [J].
Johansen, Truls E. Bjerklund ;
Zahl, Per-Henrik ;
Baco, Eduard ;
Bartoletti, Riccardo ;
Bonkat, Gernot ;
Bruyere, Franck ;
Cai, Tommaso ;
Cek, Mete ;
Kulchavenya, Ekaterina ;
Koves, Bela ;
Mouraviev, Vladimir ;
Pilatz, Adrian ;
Tandogdu, Zafer ;
Tenke, Peter ;
Wagenlehner, Florian M. E. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (01) :17-26
[10]   Systematic Review of Complications of Prostate Biopsy [J].
Loeb, Stacy ;
Vellekoop, Annelies ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Catto, James ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Nam, Robert ;
Rosario, Derek J. ;
Scattoni, Vincenzo ;
Lotan, Yair .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (06) :876-892