Research on the coal thickness prediction method based on VMD and SVM

被引:0
作者
Aiping Z. [1 ,2 ]
Jiawei Z. [3 ]
Enming R. [1 ,2 ]
Tao L. [1 ,2 ]
Fei J. [1 ,2 ]
Xingjin L. [1 ,2 ]
Huairui S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Engineering Laboratory for Deep Mine Rockburst Disaster Assessment, Jinan
[2] Geophysical Prospecting and Surveying Team of Shandong Bureau of Coal Geology, Jinan
[3] School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou
[4] Shandong Coal Field Geological Survey and Research Institute, Jinan
来源
Meitiandizhi Yu Kantan/Coal Geology and Exploration | 2021年 / 49卷 / 06期
关键词
Coal thickness; Seismic attribute; Support vector machine; Variable modal decomposition;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.06.029
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Changes in coal thickness have an important impact on safe and efficient coal mining. In order to solve the problem of large errors in coal thickness prediction results when the 3D seismic data contains noise, a method in which variable modal decomposition(VMD) and support vector machine(SVM) methods are combined for coal thickness prediction is proposed. Firstly, a coal-thickness wedge model is constructed and seismic forward modeling is performed on it. Based on the condition of thin coal seam thickness, the amplitude attribute and bandwidth attribute have a good positive correlation with the coal thickness, while the instantaneous frequency attribute has a good negative correlation with the coal thickness. With noise applied to forward seismic records, the experimental results show that noise has a greater impact on coal thickness prediction by using seismic attributes. After VMD denoising, based on SVM, the prediction results of actual seismic data are basically consistent with the coal seam information revealed through existing boreholes. The minimum absolute error is only 0.02 m and the maximum absolute error is 0.52 m, showing the feasibility and effectiveness of the coal thickness prediction method. It provides reference for coal thickness inversion in the low SNR area. © 2022 Meitiandizhi Yu Kantan/Coal Geology and Exploration. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 250
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ZHANG Mingjian, LI Feng, YANG Liu, Research on the determination of reasonable mining ratio in fully mechanized caving mining with large thickness variation coefficient[J/OL], Coal Science and Technology, pp. 1-10, (2020)
[2]  
ZHONG Qitao, Research and application of coal seam thickness inversion method, (2001)
[3]  
LI Qinghai, ZHANG Cunzhi, LI Kaixin, Et al., Analysis of the influence of different parameters of mining under super-thick loose layer on surface subsidence, Coal Science and Technology, (2020)
[4]  
SHANG Xiuquan, YANG Haoyu, AI Guo, Et al., Mining-induced stress changes and rock burst effect in thickness variation of a coal seam[J], China Mining Magazine, 29, 7, pp. 148-151, (2020)
[5]  
SUN Yuan, ZHANG Liang, ZHU Jun, Et al., Application of seismic attribute parameters in forecasting coal seam thickness[J], Coal Geology & Exploration, 36, 2, pp. 58-60, (2008)
[6]  
GUO Yinjing, JU Yuanyuan, FAN Xiaojing, Et al., Progress in research of in–seam seismic exploration[J], Coal Geology & Exploration, 48, pp. 216-227, (2020)
[7]  
Zuiliang LIU, WANG Ji, Periods of refracted P-waves in coal seams and their applications in coal thickness estimations[J], Acta Geophysica, 68, 6, pp. 1753-1762, (2020)
[8]  
ZHAO Kai, Application of seismic channel wave exploration in coal thickness exploration[J], Energy Technology and Management, 45, 5, pp. 164-165, (2020)
[9]  
YANG Wenqiang, Seismic facies analysis and seam thickness prediction of middle coal seam in Suntuan mine, (2019)
[10]  
ZHANG Xianxu, Model–driven energy attenuation method for coal seam strong reflection[J], Coal Geology & Exploration, 48, 3, pp. 188-194, (2020)