HSE risk prioritization of molybdenum operation process using extended FMEA approach based on Fuzzy BWM and Z-WASPAS

被引:33
作者
Akbari R. [1 ]
Dabbagh R. [1 ]
Ghoushchi S.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia
关键词
Failure mode effects analysis; fuzzy BWM; HSE; WASPAS; Z-Numbers;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-191749
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the most crucial components in risk management in an organization is detection of risk modes in a system, prioritization of them and making plans in order to enact corrective actions. And one of the common methods for prioritization of risks is the conventional Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA). Although this approach is widely used in different industries, it suffers from some shortcomings, which can lead to failures in reaching reality-based results. This research study, therefore, proposed an approach in three phases for the compensation of the shortcomings of the FMEA method. In the first phase, the FMEA method was used to detect different risk modes and then assign values to the Risk Priority Number (RPN) determinant factors. In the second phase, the weights of the triple factors were calculated by means of Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM) and experts' opinions. And finally, with respect to the outputs of previous phases, the risks were ranked by means of the proposed Z-WASPAS method. In addition to the assignment of different weights to the triple factors and considering the feature of uncertainty in these factors, the proposed approach paid attention to reliability in the risk modes via the Z-Numbers theory. The proposed approach was applied in the operation processes of Mes-e Sarcheshmeh molybdenum factory in Iran and the results indicated a full ranking of risks compared to other conventional methods such as FMEA and fuzzy WASPAS. © 2020 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5157 / 5173
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Aboutorab H., Saberi M., Asadabadi M.R., Hussain O., Chang E., ZBWM: The Z-number extension of Best worst method and its application for supplier development, Expert Systems with Applications, 107, pp. 115-125, (2018)
[2]  
Ahsan D., Pedersen S., Nielsen M.R.B., Ovesen J., Why does the offshore wind industry need standardized HSE management systems?. An evidence from Denmark, Renewable Energy, 136, pp. 691-700, (2019)
[3]  
Akkaya G., Turanoglu B., Oztas S., An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MOORA approach to the problem of industrial engineering sector choosing, Expert Systems with Applications, 42, pp. 9565-9573, (2015)
[4]  
Azadeh A., Zarrin M., An intelligent framework for productivity assessment and analysis of human resource from resilience engineering, motivational factors, HSE and ergonomics perspectives, Safety Science, 89, pp. 55-71, (2016)
[5]  
Baghery M., Yousefi S., Rezaee M.J., Risk measurement and prioritization of auto parts manufacturing processes based on process failure analysis, interval data envelopment analysis and grey relational analysis, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, pp. 1-23, (2016)
[6]  
Bakhtavar E., Yousefi S., Assessment of workplace accident risks in underground collieries by integrating a multi-goal cause-and-effect analysis method with MCDM sensitivity analysis, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 32, pp. 3317-3332, (2018)
[7]  
Dabbagh R., Yousefi S., A hybrid decision-making approach based on FCM and MOORA for occupational health and safety risk analysis, Journal of Safety Research, 71, pp. 111-123, (2019)
[8]  
Adhikary D.D., Bose G.K., Bose D., Mitra S., Multi criteria FMECA for coal-fired thermal power plants using COPRAS-G, International Journal of Quality&Reliability Management, 31, pp. 601-614, (2014)
[9]  
Deng Y., D numbers: Theory and applications, Journal of Information & Computational Science, 9, pp. 2421-2428, (2012)
[10]  
Dong Y., Liu Y., Liang H., Chiclana F., Herrera-Viedma E., Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making, Omega, 75, pp. 154-164, (2018)