Advancements in machine learning techniques for coal and gas outburst prediction in underground mines

被引:26
作者
Anani, Angelina [1 ]
Adewuyi, Sefiu O. [1 ]
Risso, Nathalie [1 ]
Nyaaba, Wedam [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Min & Geol Engn, 1235 James E Rogers Way, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Orthopaed, 835 S Wolcott Ave, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Mining hazard; Machine learning; Optimization algorithms; Artificial intelligence; Coal mining; NEURAL-NETWORK; ELECTROMAGNETIC-RADIATION; MODEL; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.coal.2024.104471
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Coal and gas outbursts are a major cause of fatalities in underground coal mines and pose a threat to coal power generation worldwide. Among the current mitigation efforts include monitoring methane gas levels using sen-sors, employing geophysical surveys to identify geological structures and zones prone to outbursts, and using empirical modeling for outburst predictions. However, in the wake of industry 4.0 technologies, several studies have been conducted on applying artificial intelligence methods to predict outbursts. The proposed models and their results vary significantly in the literature. This study reviews the application of machine learning (ML) to predict coal and gas outbursts in underground mines using a mixed-method approach. Most of the available literature, with a focus on ML applications in coal and gas outburst prediction, was investigated in China. Findings indicate that researchers proposed diverse ML models mostly combined with different optimization algorithms, including particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), rough set (RS), and fruit fly optimization algorithm (IFOA) for outburst prediction. The number and type of input parameters used for prediction differed significantly, with initial gas velocity being the most dominant parameter for gas outbursts, and coal seam depth as the dominant parameter for coal outbursts. The datasets for training and testing the proposed ML models in the literature varied significantly but were mostly insufficient - which questions the reliability of some of the applied ML models. Future research should investigate the effect of data size and input parameters on coal and gas outburst prediction.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Abd Elwahab A., 2023, ARAB J GEOSCI, V16, P133, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12517-023-11237-Z
[2]   Deep learning in the construction industry: A review of present status and future innovations [J].
Akinosho, Taofeek D. ;
Oyedele, Lukumon O. ;
Bilal, Muhammad ;
Ajayi, Anuoluwapo O. ;
Delgado, Manuel Davila ;
Akinade, Olugbenga O. ;
Ahmed, Ashraf A. .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2020, 32
[3]   Rockburst in underground excavations: A review of mechanism, classification, and prediction methods [J].
Askaripour, Mahdi ;
Saeidi, Ali ;
Rouleau, Alain ;
Mercier-Langevin, Patrick .
UNDERGROUND SPACE, 2022, 7 (04) :577-607
[4]  
Awad M., 2015, EFFICIENT LEARNING M, P67
[5]   Machine Learning in predicting the extent of gas and rock outburst [J].
Bodlak, Maciej ;
Kudelko, Jan ;
Zibrow, Andrzej .
XVIII CONFERENCE OF PHD STUDENTS AND YOUNG SCIENTISTS INTERDISCIPLINARY TOPICS IN MINING AND GEOLOGY, 2018, 71
[6]  
Boser B. E., 1992, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, P144, DOI 10.1145/130385.130401
[7]  
BP p.l.c, 2022, bp Statistical Review of World Energy
[8]   A review of machine learning applications for underground mine planning and scheduling [J].
Chimunhu, Prosper ;
Topal, Erkan ;
Ajak, Ajak Duany ;
Asad, Waqar .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 77
[9]   Comprehensive early warning of rock burst utilizing microseismic multi-parameter indices [J].
Dou, Linming ;
Cai, Wu ;
Cao, Anye ;
Guo, Wenhao .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 28 (05) :767-774
[10]   Statistical analysis of methane explosions in Turkey's underground coal mines and some recommendations for the prevention of these accidents: 2010-2017 [J].
Dursun, Arif Emre .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2020, 104 (01) :329-351