Impact of vaccine coverage and disruption to health services on COVID-19 in Ukraine

被引:0
作者
Costantino, Valentina [1 ]
Macintyre, Chandini R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Kirby Inst, Biosecur Program, High St, Sydney, Australia
[2] Arizona State Univ, Coll Hlth Solut, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Watts Coll Publ Affairs & Community Solut, Tempe, AZ USA
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Coronavirus; Modelling; Infectious diseases; Outbreak response; Ukraine; Masks; Vaccination; SARS-COV-2; INFECTION; UNITED-STATES; OMICRON; HOSPITALIZATION; CALIFORNIA; MORTALITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-57447-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
COVID-19 surveillance in Ukraine ceased after the Russian invasion of the country in 2022, on a background of low vaccination rates of 34.5% for two doses at this time. We conducted a modelling study to estimate the epidemic trajectory of SARS-COV-2 in Ukraine after the start of the war. We use a COVID-19 deterministic Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered (SEIR) model for Ukraine to estimate the impact of increased vaccination coverage and masking as public health interventions. We fit the model output to case notification data between 6 January and 25 February 2022, then we forecast the COVID-19 epidemic trajectory in different scenarios of mask use and vaccine coverage. In the best-case scenario, 69% of the Ukrainian population would have been infected in the first half of 2022. Increasing mask use from 50 to 80% reduces cases and deaths by 17% and 30% respectively, while increasing vaccination rates to 60% and 9.6% for two and three doses respectively results in a 3% reduction in cases and 28% in deaths. However, if vaccination is increased to a higher coverage of 80% with two doses and 12.8% with three, or mask effectiveness is reduced to 40%, increasing vaccination coverage is more effective. The loss of health services, displacement, and destruction of infrastructure will amplify the risk of COVID-19 in Ukraine and make vaccine programs less feasible. Masks do not need the health infrastructure or cold-chain logistics required for vaccines and are more feasible for rapid epidemic control during war. However, increasing vaccine coverage will save more lives. Vaccination of refugees who have fled to other countries can be more feasibly achieved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Andrejko KL, 2022, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V71, P212, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm7106e1
[2]  
Andrews N., Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against the Omicron
[3]  
[Anonymous], COVID-19 Mortality in Australia: Deaths registered until 31 March 2022
[4]  
[Anonymous], Average hospital stay for Omicron patients to be a game-changer? Experts share data Internet
[5]  
[Anonymous], Impact of war on the dynamics of COVID-19 in Ukraine - Ukraine
[6]  
[Anonymous], Coronavirus cases Ukraine-COVID Live Internet
[7]  
[Anonymous], COVID-19 reporting | Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care Internet
[8]  
[Anonymous], CDC COVID DATA TRACK
[9]  
[Anonymous], WEEKLY EPIDEMIOLOGIC
[10]  
[Anonymous], Weekly COVID-19 country overview [Internet]