Biomechanical comparison of femoral neck anti-rotation and support system versus femoral neck system for unstable pauwels III femoral neck fractures

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Taiyou [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Guangjian [1 ,3 ]
Zhu, Fukang [1 ,2 ]
Qiao, Bo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthoped, 1 Youyi Rd, Chongqing 400010, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Orthoped Lab, Chongqing 400010, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Hosp Rongchang Dist, Dept Orthoped, Chongqing 402460, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Biomechanics; Femoral neck fractures; Femoral Neck anti-rotation and support system; Femoral Neck System; CANNULATED SCREWS; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-024-04987-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe optimal treatment method for managing unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of two types of Femoral Neck Anti-rotation and Support System (FNAS) and a Femoral Neck System (FNS) in unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures. MethodsEighteen synthetic femoral models were implanted with one of three fixation devices: FNS, FNAS I, or FNAS II. An unstable Pauwels III (OTA/AO 31-B2.3) femoral neck fracture was simulated using a custom-made needle and osteotomy guide. Torsion and axial compression loading tests were conducted, and the torque, torsion angle, load to failure, displacement, and stiffness values were recorded. ResultsFNAS II exhibited significantly higher torsional stiffness (0.67 +/- 0.10 Nm/degrees) compared to FNAS I (0.52 +/- 0.07 Nm/degrees, P = 0.01) and FNS (0.54 +/- 0.07 Nm/degrees, P = 0.005). FNS demonstrated significantly greater mean axial stiffness (239.24 +/- 11.38 N/mm) than both FNAS I (179.33 +/- 31.11 N/mm, P = 0.005) and FNAS II (190.07 +/- 34.11 N/mm, P = 0.022). FNAS I (302.37 +/- 33.88 N/mm, P = 0.001) and FNAS II (319.59 +/- 50.10 N/mm, P < 0.001) showed significantly higher initial axial stiffness compared to FNS (197.08 +/- 33.68 N/mm). Both FNAS I and II improved resistance to deforming forces at a load level before approximately 1000 N, which is sufficient to withstand the load from most daily life activities. No significant differences were observed in compression failure load among the groups. The failure patterns at the point of failure included the pull-out of the distal locking screw and reverse oblique intertrochanteric femur fracture for FNS, while for FNAS I and II, the failures were characterized by a cleft on the calcar femorale and a decrease in the load-displacement curve. ConclusionsIn unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures, the FNAS II enhances stability and is easier to manage for reoperation. The results of the current study support the potential of FNAS II as an alternative option for treating unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in young individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical Evaluation of the Femoral Neck System in Unstable Pauwels III Femoral Neck Fractures: A Comparison with the Dynamic Hip Screw and Cannulated Screws
    Stoffel, Karl
    Zderic, Ivan
    Gras, Florian
    Sommer, Christoph
    Eberli, Ursula
    Mueller, David
    Oswald, Martin
    Gueorguiev, Boyko
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2017, 31 (03) : 131 - 137
  • [2] Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system versus InterTan nail and three cannulated screws for unstable Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture
    Wang, Zheng
    Yang, Yong
    Feng, Gangning
    Guo, Haohui
    Chen, Zhirong
    Chen, Yaogeng
    Jin, Qunhua
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [3] Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system versus InterTan nail and three cannulated screws for unstable Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture
    Zheng Wang
    Yong Yang
    Gangning Feng
    Haohui Guo
    Zhirong Chen
    Yaogeng Chen
    Qunhua Jin
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 21
  • [4] Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous compression plate and femoral neck system in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures
    Xiaoping Xie
    Songqi Bi
    Qingxu Song
    Qiong Zhang
    Zhixing Yan
    Xiaoyang Zhou
    Tiecheng Yu
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 25 (1)
  • [5] Biomechanical comparison of femoral neck system and cannulated screws coupled with medial plate for treating Pauwels III femoral neck fractures
    Nan, Chong
    Li, Yanjun
    Liu, Yuxiu
    Ma, Liang
    Ma, Zhanbei
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2023, 31 (04) : 1161 - 1170
  • [6] Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in basicervical femoral neck fractures
    Moon, Jun-Ki
    Lee, Jung Il
    Hwang, Kyu-Tae
    Yang, Jae-Hyuk
    Park, Ye-Soo
    Park, Ki-Chul
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [7] Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in basicervical femoral neck fractures
    Jun-Ki Moon
    Jung Il Lee
    Kyu-Tae Hwang
    Jae-Hyuk Yang
    Ye-Soo Park
    Ki-Chul Park
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [8] Mechanical effects of sagittal variations on Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures treated with Femoral Neck System(FNS)
    Chong Nan
    Liang Ma
    Yuechuang Liang
    Yanjun Li
    Zhanbei Ma
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [9] Mechanical effects of sagittal variations on Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures treated with Femoral Neck System(FNS)
    Nan, Chong
    Ma, Liang
    Liang, Yuechuang
    Li, Yanjun
    Ma, Zhanbei
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [10] Treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture with medial femoral neck support screw: a biomechanical and clinical study
    Gao, Zhichao
    Wang, Mei
    Shen, Baojie
    Chu, Xiaodong
    Ruan, Di
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)