Comparative analysis of equivalent circuit battery models for electric vehicle battery management systems

被引:33
作者
Tekin, Merve [1 ]
Karamangil, M. Ihsan [1 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Uludag Univ, Dept Automot Engn, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Battery modeling; Battery management system; Thevenin model; Rint model; PNGV model; Dual polarization model; LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES; POLARIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2024.111327
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Lithium -ion batteries need to be controlled by a Battery Management System (BMS) to operate safely and efficiently. BMS controls parameters, such as current, voltage, temperature, state of charge (SoC),state of health (SoH), state of power (SoP) and etc. The battery models and several prediction algorithms that the BMS uses to carry out these checks are essential to the system's performance. Therefore, the battery model is crucial to the BMS. This model is used to optimize the performance, capacity, lifetime and safety of the battery. Using the accurate battery model for BMS and electric vehicles can improve energy efficiency, extend battery life and reduce safety risks. Therefore, it is important that the model can accurately reflect the battery behavior under different load conditions. In this study, the performance of Rint, Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV), Thevenin, and Dual Polarization (DP) battery models, which are widely known in the literature, to simulate static and dynamic voltage behavior is compared. A 18650 NMC battery was used for this purpose, and Hybrid Pulse Power Characterization (HPPC), Dynamic Stress Test (DST), Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP), and Constant Current (CC) discharge tests were performed. The performance of the models for the four tests is compared. The maximum error values for WLTP are 2.98 % in Rint, 1.32 % in PNGV, 2.80 % in Thevenin, and 1.09 % in DP. Comparing the performances of models for all tests, it is found that the DP model is the most accurate model under both constant and dynamic current conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Towards a Smarter Battery Management System for Electric Vehicle Applications: A Critical Review of Lithium-Ion Battery State of Charge Estimation [J].
Ali, Muhammad Umair ;
Zafar, Amad ;
Nengroo, Sarvar Hussain ;
Hussain, Sadam ;
Alvi, Muhammad Junaid ;
Kim, Hee-Je .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (03)
[2]   Battery Models for Battery Powered Applications: A Comparative Study [J].
Campagna, Nicola ;
Castiglia, Vincenzo ;
Miceli, Rosario ;
Mastromauro, Rosa Anna ;
Spataro, Ciro ;
Trapanese, Marco ;
Viola, Fabio .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (16)
[3]   Battery Model Identification Approach for Electric Forklift Application [J].
da Silva, Cynthia Thamires ;
Dias, Bruno Martin de Alcantara ;
Araujo, Rui Esteves ;
Pellini, Eduardo Lorenzetti ;
Lagana, Armando Antonio Maria .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (19)
[4]  
Falconi A., 2016, Modelisation electrochimique du comportement d' une cellule Li-ion pour application au vehicule electrique
[5]   A Reduced-Order Electrochemical Model of Li-Ion Batteries for Control and Estimation Applications [J].
Fan, Guodong ;
Li, Xiaoyu ;
Canova, Marcello .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 67 (01) :76-91
[6]   An Adaptive Approach for Battery State of Charge and State of Power Co-Estimation With a Fractional-Order Multi-Model System Considering Temperatures [J].
Guo, Ruohan ;
Hu, Cungang ;
Shen, Weixiang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 24 (12) :15131-15145
[7]   An enhanced multi-constraint state of power estimation algorithm for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles [J].
Guo, Ruohan ;
Shen, Weixiang .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2022, 50
[8]   A Review of Equivalent Circuit Model Based Online State of Power Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles [J].
Guo, Ruohan ;
Shen, Weixiang .
VEHICLES, 2022, 4 (01) :1-29
[9]  
Gurjer L., 2019, P 2019 3 IEEE INT C, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICECCT.2019.8869224
[10]   A comparative study of equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries [J].
Hu, Xiaosong ;
Li, Shengbo ;
Peng, Huei .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2012, 198 :359-367