Gene count normalization in single-cell imaging-based spatially resolved transcriptomics

被引:6
作者
Atta, Lyla [1 ,2 ]
Clifton, Kalen [1 ,2 ]
Anant, Manjari [2 ,3 ]
Aihara, Gohta [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Jean [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Computat Biol, Whiting Sch Engn, Baltimore, MD 21211 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Neurosci, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
Normalization; Scaling factor; Spatial transcriptomics; Differential expression;
D O I
10.1186/s13059-024-03303-w
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background Recent advances in imaging-based spatially resolved transcriptomics (im-SRT) technologies now enable high-throughput profiling of targeted genes and their locations in fixed tissues. Normalization of gene expression data is often needed to account for technical factors that may confound underlying biological signals.Results Here, we investigate the potential impact of different gene count normalization methods with different targeted gene panels in the analysis and interpretation of im-SRT data. Using different simulated gene panels that overrepresent genes expressed in specific tissue regions or cell types, we demonstrate how normalization methods based on detected gene counts per cell differentially impact normalized gene expression magnitudes in a region- or cell type-specific manner. We show that these normalization-induced effects may reduce the reliability of downstream analyses including differential gene expression, gene fold change, and spatially variable gene analysis, introducing false positive and false negative results when compared to results obtained from gene panels that are more representative of the gene expression of the tissue's component cell types. These effects are not observed with normalization approaches that do not use detected gene counts for gene expression magnitude adjustment, such as with cell volume or cell area normalization.Conclusions We recommend using non-gene count-based normalization approaches when feasible and evaluating gene panel representativeness before using gene count-based normalization methods if necessary. Overall, we caution that the choice of normalization method and gene panel may impact the biological interpretation of the im-SRT data.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
10x Genomics, Pre-designed Xenium Gene Expression Panels
[2]  
Aihara G, 2024, bioRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2024.02.01.578436, 10.1101/2024.02.01.578436, DOI 10.1101/2024.02.01.578436]
[3]  
[Anonymous], LylaAtta123/normalization-analyses
[4]  
[Anonymous], seqFISH Mouse Kidney
[5]  
[Anonymous], Preview Data: FFPE Human Lung Cancer with Xenium Multimodal Cell Segmentation
[6]  
[Anonymous], DATASETS
[7]  
[Anonymous], Vizgen MERFISH Mouse Receptor Map
[8]  
[Anonymous], High resolution mapping of the breast cancer tumor microenvironment using integrated single cell, spatial and in situ analysis of FFPE tissue
[9]  
[Anonymous], Spatial Atlas of Molecular Cell Types and AAV Accessibility across the Whole Mouse Brain-Single Cell Portal
[10]  
[Anonymous], nnSVG for the scalable identification of spatially variable genes using nearest-neighbor Gaussian processes | Nature Communications