Updates on RFC 4944: Fragment forwarding and recovery

被引:2
|
作者
Papadopoulos G.Z. [1 ]
Arvind Jadhav R.
Thubert P.
Montavont N. [2 ]
机构
[1] IMT Atlantique, Rennes
[2] National institute of Standard and Technologies (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD
来源
IEEE Communications Standards Magazine | 2019年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
Internet protocols - IEEE Standards - Wireless local area networks (WLAN);
D O I
10.1109/MCOMSTD.2019.1900009
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2005, IPv6 over Low Power WPAN (6LoW-PAN), the first Working Group (WG) on the Internet of Things (IoT), was established in the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to standardize mechanisms to transmit IPv6 datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4 technology. Since IPv6 may contain datagram sizes much larger than the IEEE 802.15.4 maximum frame size, a new adaptation layer was specified by standardizing several documents such RFC 4944, RFC 6282, and RFC 6775 in the 6LoWPAN WG. In 2007, RFC 4944 was published, and it defines the frame format for transmission of IPv6 datagrams. Moreover, it specifies techniques for header compression, fragmentation, and reassembly, and two fragment forwarding modes, “mesh under” and “route over.” In 2012, RFC 6282 was published to update RFC 4944; however, it does not update the fragment forwarding mechanism. Indeed, an IPv6 datagram larger than 1000 bytes could be fragmented to 10 fragments when considering IEEE 802.15.4 technology that comes with a maximum transmission unit of 127 bytes. Furthermore, under the 6LoWPAN route-over mode, the fragmented 6LoWPAN datagram must be reassembled and fragmented again at every hop, which will negatively affect the network reliability and latency. In this article, we first introduce the main operations of RFC 4944, and then we present the potential fragment forwarding issues when the route over mode is employed. We then give an overview of the ongoing proposed works at the IETF to solve the undesired issues of RFC 4944. © 2019 IEEE
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 59
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RFC 4944: Per-hop Fragmentation and Reassembly Issues
    Papadopoulos, Georgios Z.
    Thubert, Pascal
    Tsakalidis, Sotirios
    Montavont, Nicolas
    2018 IEEE CONFERENCE ON STANDARDS FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING (IEEE CSCN), 2018,
  • [2] Fragment Forwarding in Lossy Networks
    Lenders, Martine S.
    Schmidt, Thomas C.
    Waehlisch, Matthias
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 143969 - 143987
  • [3] Fast incremental updates for pipelined forwarding engines
    Basu, A
    Narlikar, G
    IEEE INFOCOM 2003: THE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 64 - 74
  • [4] Forwarding engine for fast routing lookups and updates
    Yu, DX
    Smith, BC
    Wei, B
    GLOBECOM'99: SEAMLESS INTERCONNECTION FOR UNIVERSAL SERVICES, VOL 1-5, 1999, : 1556 - 1564
  • [5] Fast incremental updates for pipelined forwarding engines
    Basu, A
    Narlikar, G
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2005, 13 (03) : 690 - 703
  • [6] 6LoWPAN Fragment Forwarding
    Tanaka Y.
    Minet P.
    Watteyne T.
    IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 2019, 3 (01): : 35 - 39
  • [7] Forwarding Loop Avoidance using ordered Forwarding Information Base Updates in Wired Networks
    Jeba, Getzi
    Vani, A. Geetha
    ICCN: 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING, 2008, : 523 - 526
  • [8] Scheduling of updates in an IP forwarding engine with partitioned prefix tables
    Kim, Junghwan
    Kim, Jinsoo
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2008, PT 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5073 : 808 - 819
  • [9] Loop-Free Forwarding Table Updates with Minimal Link Overflow
    Shi, Lei
    Fu, Jing
    Fu, Xiaoming
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-8, 2009, : 2091 - +
  • [10] A Study of the Forwarding Blackhole phenomenon during Software-Defined Network Updates
    Guidara, Amine
    Pomares Hernandez, Saul E.
    Rodriguez Henriquez, Lil Maria X.
    Kacem, Hatem Hadj
    Kacem, Ahmed Hadj
    2019 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE DEFINED SYSTEMS (SDS), 2019, : 186 - 193