Review of Automatic Target Recognition Evaluation Method Development

被引：0
作者：
He J. [1 ]
Fu R. [1 ]
Fu Q. [1 ]
机构：
[1] National Key Laboratory of Automatic Target Recognition, College of Electronic Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
来源：
Journal of Radars | 2023年 / 12卷 / 06期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Automatic Target Recognition (ATR); Decision analysis; Patten recognition; Performance evaluation;
D O I：
10.12000/JR23094
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) is an interdisciplinary technological field related to pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, and information processing. ATR evaluation focuses on accessing ATR algorithms and systems. Due to the noncooperative targets, complex operating conditions, and multiple subjective preferences of the decision maker, ATR evaluation is performed for the entire ATR research process and shows its importance in guiding ATR development. This paper presents the connotation of ATR evaluation and briefly reviews ATR development. Furthermore, the conventional methods, applications, and latest developments in ATR evaluation are presented and discussed from the perspective of performance measures, test condition, inference and decision. Finally, several ATR evaluation research directions are summarized. This paper serves as a valuable reference for a better understanding of ATR evaluation and the effective adoption of various ATR evaluation methods. ©The Author(s) 2023.
引用
收藏
页码：1215 / 1228
页数：13
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [1] BHANU B, DUDGEON D E, ZELNIO E G, Et al., Guest editorial introduction to the special issue on automatic target detection and recognition[J], IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6, 1, pp. 1-6, (1997)
  • [2] Weidong HU, Restudy on the technique of radar target recognition[J], Modern Radar, 34, 8, pp. 1-5, (2012)
  • [3] YU Wenxian, Automatic target recognition from an engineering perspective[J], Journal of Radars, 11, 5, pp. 737-752, (2022)
  • [4] ZHANG Tianxu, Automated Recognition of Imaged Targets, (2005)
  • [5] ROSS T D, MOSSING J C., The MSTAR evaluation methodology[C], SPIE 3721, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery VI, pp. 705-713, (1999)
  • [6] ROSS T D., Confidence intervals for ATR performance metrics[C], SPIE 4382, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery VIII, pp. 318-329, (2001)
  • [7] MOSSING J C, ROSS T D., Evaluation of SAR ATR algorithm performance sensitivity to MSTAR extended operating conditions[C], SPIE 3370, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery V, pp. 554-565, (1998)
  • [8] ROSS T D, MINARDI M E., Discrimination and confidence error in detector-reported scores[C], SPIE 5427, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery XI, pp. 342-353, (2004)
  • [9] ROSS T D, WESTERKAMP L A, ZELNIO E G, Et al., Extensibility and other model-based ATR evaluation concepts[C], SPIE 3070, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery IV, pp. 554-565, (1997)
  • [10] ROSS T D, BRADLEY J J, HUDSON L J, Et al., SAR ATR: So what’s the problem? An MSTAR perspective[C], SPIE 3721, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery VI, pp. 662-672, (1999)
12345678910