Employee voice as a means to facilitate organizational safety and crisis preparedness

被引:2
作者
Zeng, Cheng [1 ,5 ]
Kelly, Stephanie [2 ]
Goke, Ryan [3 ]
Diers-Lawson, Audra [4 ]
机构
[1] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Commun, Fargo, ND USA
[2] North Carolina Agr & Tech State Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Greensboro, NC USA
[3] Murray State Univ, Dept Org Commun & Leadership, Murray, KY USA
[4] Kristiania Univ Coll, Sch Commun Leadership & Mkt, Oslo, Norway
[5] Minard 338,1210 Albrecht Blvd, Fargo, ND 58102 USA
关键词
Employee voice; organizational crisis; crisis preparedness; safety culture; CULTURE; COMMUNICATION; ANTECEDENTS; LEADERSHIP; BEHAVIORS; SILENCE; CONTEXT; DISSENT; MANAGER; MYTHS;
D O I
10.1080/01463373.2024.2344760
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
A comprehensive diagnosis of an organization's preparedness for a crisis requires an examination of its climate beyond the influences from the management. This study emphasizes the crucial role employees play in establishing and maintaining a climate that will survive crises by examining the function of promotive and prohibitive voice in fostering a culture of safety. The current study proposed a model in which employee promotive and prohibitive voices impact organizational crisis preparedness through the mediation of organizational safety culture. 329 working adults participated in the study through answering an online questionnaire on MTurk. The data were consistent with the proposed path model, demonstrating the critical role that employee voice plays in creating a culture of safety, which ultimately leaves an organization adequately or inadequately prepared for a potential crisis event.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 319
页数:21
相关论文
共 81 条
[11]   Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing [J].
Casler, Krista ;
Bickel, Lydia ;
Hackett, Elizabeth .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 29 (06) :2156-2160
[12]   Re-framing risk: The changing context of disaster mitigation and preparedness [J].
Christoplos, I ;
Mitchell, J ;
Liljelund, A .
DISASTERS, 2001, 25 (03) :185-198
[13]  
Clarke S, 1999, J ORGAN BEHAV, V20, P185, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199903)20:2<185::AID-JOB892>3.0.CO
[14]  
2-C
[15]   Crisis communications preparedness among US organizations: Activities and assessments by public relations practitioners [J].
Cloudman, Reghan ;
Hallahan, Kirk .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2006, 32 (04) :367-376
[16]   Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory [J].
Coombs W.T. .
Corporate Reputation Review, 2007, 10 (3) :163-176
[17]  
Coombs W.Timothy., 1996, Journal of Public Relations Research, V8, P279, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR0804_04, 10.1207/s1532754xjprr0804_04]
[18]   Towards a model of safety culture [J].
Cooper, MD .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2000, 36 (02) :111-136
[19]  
Cowley S., 2017, NEW YORK TIMES
[20]  
Detert JR, 2010, HARVARD BUS REV, V88, P26