A Comparative Visual Analytics Framework for Evaluating Evolutionary Processes in Multi-Objective Optimization

被引:4
作者
Huang, Yansong [1 ]
Zhang, Zherui [1 ]
Jiao, Ao [1 ]
Ma, Yuxin [1 ]
Cheng, Ran [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Visual analytics; evolutionary multi-objective optimization; MODEL SELECTION; VISUALIZATION; ALGORITHM; SETS;
D O I
10.1109/TVCG.2023.3326921
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms have been demonstrated to be effective in solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. In real-world applications, analysts often employ several algorithms concurrently and compare their solution sets to gain insight into the characteristics of different algorithms and explore a broader range of feasible solutions. However, EMO algorithms are typically treated as black boxes, leading to difficulties in performing detailed analysis and comparisons between the internal evolutionary processes. Inspired by the successful application of visual analytics tools in explainable AI, we argue that interactive visualization can significantly enhance the comparative analysis between multiple EMO algorithms. In this paper, we present a visual analytics framework that enables the exploration and comparison of evolutionary processes in EMO algorithms. Guided by a literature review and expert interviews, the proposed framework addresses various analytical tasks and establishes a multi-faceted visualization design to support the comparative analysis of intermediate generations in the evolution as well as solution sets. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework through case studies on benchmarking and real-world multi-objective optimization problems to elucidate how analysts can leverage our framework to inspect and compare diverse algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 671
页数:11
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [31] Quality Evaluation of Solution Sets in Multiobjective Optimisation: A Survey
    Li, Miqing
    Yao, Xin
    [J]. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2019, 52 (02)
  • [32] How to Read Many-Objective Solution Sets in Parallel Coordinates
    Li, Miqing
    Zhen, Liangli
    Yao, Xin
    [J]. IEEE COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE MAGAZINE, 2017, 12 (04) : 88 - +
  • [33] DeepTracker: Visualizing the Training Process of Convolutional Neural Networks
    Liu, Dongyu
    Cui, Weiwei
    Jin, Kai
    Guo, Yuxiao
    Qu, Huamin
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 10 (01)
  • [34] Analyzing the Training Processes of Deep Generative Models
    Liu, Mengchen
    Shi, Jiaxin
    Cao, Kelei
    Zhu, Jun
    Liu, Shixia
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2018, 24 (01) : 77 - 87
  • [35] Visual Diagnosis of Tree Boosting Methods
    Liu, Shixia
    Xiao, Jiannan
    Liu, Junlin
    Wang, Xiting
    Wu, Jing
    Zhu, Jun
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2018, 24 (01) : 163 - 173
  • [36] Lotov A., 2004, Interactive Decision Maps: Approximation and Visualization of Pareto Frontier, P2
  • [37] Lu K., 2023, P ACM CHI C HUM FACT
  • [38] Lu Y., 2017, Computer Graphics Forum, V36, P2
  • [39] Neural Architecture Search as Multiobjective Optimization Benchmarks: Problem Formulation and Performance Assessment
    Lu, Zhichao
    Cheng, Ran
    Jin, Yaochu
    Tan, Kay Chen
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2024, 28 (02) : 323 - 337
  • [40] Ma Y., 2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, V27, P3