A Comparative Visual Analytics Framework for Evaluating Evolutionary Processes in Multi-Objective Optimization

被引:4
作者
Huang, Yansong [1 ]
Zhang, Zherui [1 ]
Jiao, Ao [1 ]
Ma, Yuxin [1 ]
Cheng, Ran [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Visual analytics; evolutionary multi-objective optimization; MODEL SELECTION; VISUALIZATION; ALGORITHM; SETS;
D O I
10.1109/TVCG.2023.3326921
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms have been demonstrated to be effective in solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. In real-world applications, analysts often employ several algorithms concurrently and compare their solution sets to gain insight into the characteristics of different algorithms and explore a broader range of feasible solutions. However, EMO algorithms are typically treated as black boxes, leading to difficulties in performing detailed analysis and comparisons between the internal evolutionary processes. Inspired by the successful application of visual analytics tools in explainable AI, we argue that interactive visualization can significantly enhance the comparative analysis between multiple EMO algorithms. In this paper, we present a visual analytics framework that enables the exploration and comparison of evolutionary processes in EMO algorithms. Guided by a literature review and expert interviews, the proposed framework addresses various analytical tasks and establishes a multi-faceted visualization design to support the comparative analysis of intermediate generations in the evolution as well as solution sets. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework through case studies on benchmarking and real-world multi-objective optimization problems to elucidate how analysts can leverage our framework to inspect and compare diverse algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 671
页数:11
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [11] Coello CAC, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2972, P688
  • [12] Deb K, 2002, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P825, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2002.1007032
  • [13] The State of the Art in Integrating Machine Learning into Visual Analytics
    Endert, A.
    Ribarsky, W.
    Turkay, C.
    Wong, B. L. William
    Nabney, I.
    Diaz Blanco, I.
    Rossi, F.
    [J]. COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM, 2017, 36 (08) : 458 - 486
  • [14] Feydy Jean, 2019, PR MACH LEARN RES, V89, P2681
  • [15] Geatpy, About us
  • [16] Gleicher M., 2020, Computer Graphics Forum, V39, P2
  • [17] Considerations for Visualizing Comparison
    Gleicher, Michael
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2018, 24 (01) : 413 - 423
  • [18] Gong MG, 2007, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P15
  • [19] A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models
    Guidotti, Riccardo
    Monreale, Anna
    Ruggieri, Salvatore
    Turin, Franco
    Giannotti, Fosca
    Pedreschi, Dino
    [J]. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2019, 51 (05)
  • [20] A repository of real-world datasets for data-driven evolutionary multiobjective optimization
    He, Cheng
    Tian, Ye
    Wang, Handing
    Jin, Yaochu
    [J]. COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 6 (01) : 189 - 197