Interspecific relationships of universities with their stakeholders: Biological metaphor

被引：0
作者：
Barrera-Rodríguez A.M. [1 ,2 ]
Vieira-Salazar J.A. [2 ]
Duque-Oliva E.J. [3 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas y Contables, Universidad Libre, Pereira
[2] Facultad de Administración, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales
[3] Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá
[4] ESAI Business School, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón
来源：
Barrera-Rodríguez, Ana M. (anam.barrerar@unilibre.edu.co) | 1600年 / Centro de Informacion Tecnologica卷 / 31期
关键词：
Biological metaphor; Interspecific relations; Stakeholders; University;
D O I：
10.4067/S0718-07642020000400211
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The purpose of this article is to identify the different interspecific relationships that universities face with their stakeholders through the use of the methodology of development of biological metaphors. Universities recognize the importance of their relationships with their interest groups because their prestige and recognition depend largely on these groups. The results show that these relationships can be associated with the interspecific relationships that occur at the biological level. Mutualism, which can be called “win-win,” is observed in the relationships between the university and its students, professors, administrative officials, and the private and public sector. Parasitism can be generated from within by various groups with individual interest. In conclusion, biological metaphoric models can be applied to the management of interspecific relationships by universities and their interest groups. © 2020 Centro de Informacion Tecnologica. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：211 / 220
页数：9
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Aldeanuava-Fernandez I., Los grupos de interés en el ámbito de la responsabilidad social universitaria: un enfoque teórico, Anuario Jurídico y Económico Escurialense, 46, pp. 235-254, (2013)
  • [2] Alonso-Almeida M. D. M., Llach J., Socially responsible companies: Are they the best workplace for millennials? A cross-national analysis, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 1, pp. 238-247, (2019)
  • [3] Aly A. H., Debbab A., Proksch P., Fungal endophytes: Unique plant inhabitants with great promises, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 90, 6, pp. 1829-1845, (2011)
  • [4] El pensamiento Universitario Na21 Responsabilidad social universitaria, Revistas ASCUN, 2, (2011)
  • [5] Bansah K. J., Dumakor-Dupey N. K., Stemn E., Galecki G., Mutualism, commensalism or parasitism? Perspectives on tailings trade between large-scale and artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Ghana, Resources Policy, 57, pp. 246-254, (2018)
  • [6] Barrera-Rodriguez A. M., Rodriguez O., Informal institutions that are a result of governance structure: Internal identification in public, private, and hybrid organizations, Revista ESPACIOS, 39, 34, (2018)
  • [7] Bascompte J., Mutualism and biodiversity, Current Biology, 29, 11, pp. R467-R470, (2019)
  • [8] Bueno E., Salmador M. P., Rodriguez O., Martin-De Castro G., Internal logic of intellectual capital: A biological approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7, 3, pp. 394-405, (2006)
  • [9] Caja-Vivancos S., Garcia-Gomez M. J., ¿Parasitismo o simbiosis en las relaciones entre universidad y calle? Issuc: una propuesta práctica de cómo hacer carrera académica colaborando en la transformación del entorno y en la visibilización de todos los agentes sociales, Respuestas transdisciplinares en una sociedad global. Aportaciones desde el Trabajo Social, pp. 1-25, (2016)
  • [10] Castro-Rios G. A., Noguera Hidalgo A. L., Depredación organizacional: las consecuencias del uso del poder en la organización, Estudios Gerenciales, 30, 132, pp. 233-242, (2014)
123456