(Un)employment of AI in Higher Education

被引:0
作者
Bahar Memarian [1 ]
Tenzin Doleck [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC
基金
加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence (AI); Education; Employment; Pedagogy; Training;
D O I
10.1007/s42979-024-03138-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the rapid adoption of technological advancements (e.g., artificial intelligence or AI) and changes within higher education, the (un)employment (herein referring to utilizing or firing AI as an educational employee) of AI will change and likely become more complex. There is a pressing need to explore the research trends of employing AI in higher education. We conduct a review to examine the research designs, areas of impact, and nature of benefits and disadvantages offered by (un)employing AI in higher education. We searched SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google and identified a total of 584 studies for review (145 from WOS, 289 from SCOPUS, and 150 from Google). Following our inclusion criteria, the authors screened and assessed the studies for eligibility until a consensus was reached. A total of 47 studies were included in the review. For research design and theory, we find that the most emergent trend is qualitative research design with a mix of technological and social theories (N = 13). For impact areas and valence of AI on (un)employment in higher education, we find that the most emergent trend is the impact of AI on labor and employment is a mix of valences by having the highest count of a mix of positive and negative (N = 13) followed by being negative (N = 9) and positive (N = 5). For the benefits and disadvantages of AI on (un)employment in higher education, we find that the most emergent trend is a mix of both technological and social, and pedagogical benefits and disadvantages (N = 21). The contribution of this work is in recognizing and characterizing plausible shifts to AI (un)employment in higher education and mitigation strategies. © Crown 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Aghion P., Antonin C., Bunel S., Artificial intelligence, growth and employment: the role of policy, Econ Stat, 511, pp. 150-164, (2019)
  • [2] Aghion P., Antonin C., Bunel S., On the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Growth and Employment. Openmind BBVA, (2020)
  • [3] Ahmed A.A.A., Mahalakshmi A., ArulRajan K., Alanya-Beltran J., Naved M., Integrated artificial intelligence effect on crisis management and lean production: structural equation modelling frame work, Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag, 14, 1, pp. 220-227, (2023)
  • [4] Ayoola O.O., Alenoghena R., Adeniji S., ChatGPT impacts on access-efficiency, employment, education and ethics: the socio-economics of an AI language model, BizEcons Q, 16, pp. 1-17, (2023)
  • [5] Azariadis C., Cooper R., Nominal wage-price rigidity as a rational expectations equilibrium, Am Econ Rev, 75, 2, pp. 31-35, (1985)
  • [6] Bates T., Cobo C., Marino O., Wheeler S., Can artificial intelligence transform higher education?, Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 17, 1, pp. 1-12, (2020)
  • [7] Baumol W.J., Retrospectives: Say’s law, J Econ Perspect, 13, 1, pp. 195-204, (1999)
  • [8] Bearman M., Ryan J., Ajjawi R., Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: a critical literature review, High Educ, (2022)
  • [9] Beng Y.H., Yi W.C., Kaur S., Examining tertiary learners’ preparedness to face their future employment in fourth industrial revolution era, A.-S. S.Z.S.I., W. M.H.A., M. W.A.W., J. M.A., Editors. AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2608. American Institute of Physics Inc.
  • [10] 2023.