Improving the Forecasts of Coastal Wind Speeds in Tianjin, China Based on the WRF Model with Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:4
作者
Zhang, Weihang [1 ]
Tian, Meng [2 ]
Hai, Shangfei [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Fei [1 ]
An, Xiadong [1 ]
Li, Wanju [1 ]
Li, Xiaodong [4 ]
Sheng, Lifang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Coll Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Inst Meteorol Sci, Tianjin Key Lab Ocean Meteorol, Tianjin 300074, Peoples R China
[3] China Meteorol Adm CMA, CMA Earth Syst Modeling & Predict Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Qingdao Meteorol Bur, Qingdao 266003, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
machine learning; Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model; wind speed forecasting; coastal region; ACCURACY; WEATHER; PRECIPITATION; PREDICTION; POLLUTION; PATTERNS; IMPACTS; CLIMATE; OZONE; TRACK;
D O I
10.1007/s13351-024-3096-z
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Characterized by sudden changes in strength, complex influencing factors, and significant impacts, the wind speed in the circum-Bohai Sea area is relatively challenging to forecast. On the western side of Bohai Bay, as the economic center of the circum-Bohai Sea, Tianjin exhibits a high demand for accurate wind forecasting. In this study, three machine learning algorithms were employed and compared as post-processing methods to correct wind speed forecasts by the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model for Tianjin. The results showed that the random forest (RF) achieved better performance in improving the forecasts because it substantially reduced the model bias at a lower computing cost, while the support vector machine (SVM) performed slightly worse (especially for stronger winds), but it required an approximately 15 times longer computing time. The back propagation (BP) neural network produced an average forecast significantly closer to the observed forecast but insufficiently reduced the RMSE. In regard to wind speed frequency forecasting, the RF method commendably corrected the forecasts of the frequency of moderate (force 3) wind speeds, while the BP method showed a desirable capability for correcting the forecasts of stronger (force > 6) winds. In addition, the 10-m u and v components of wind (u10 and v10), 2-m relative humidity (RH2) and temperature (T-2), 925-hPa u (u(925)), sea level pressure (SLP), and 500-hPa temperature (T500) were identified as the main factors leading to bias in wind speed forecasting by the WRF model in Tianjin, indicating the importance of local dynamical/thermodynamic processes in regulating the wind speed. This study demonstrates that the combination of numerical models and machine learning techniques has important implications for refined local wind forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 585
页数:16
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Anarde KA, 2018, NAT HAZARDS REV, V19, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000265, 10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000265]
[2]  
Andrews D.G., 2000, An Introduction to Atmospheric Physics, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511800788, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511800788]
[3]   Impacts of the mountain-plains solenoid and cold pool dynamics on the diurnal variation of warm-season precipitation over northern China [J].
Bao, Xinghua ;
Zhang, Fuqing .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2013, 13 (14) :6965-6982
[4]   AWNN-Assisted Wind Power Forecasting Using Feed-Forward Neural Network [J].
Bhaskar, Kanna ;
Singh, S. N. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2012, 3 (02) :306-315
[5]  
Biau G, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P1063
[6]   PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models [J].
Boylan, James W. ;
Russell, Armistead G. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (26) :4946-4959
[7]   SEDE-GPS: socio-economic data enrichment based on GPS information [J].
Sperlea, Theodor ;
Fueser, Stefan ;
Boenigk, Jens ;
Heider, Dominik .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 19
[8]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[9]   Deriving global parameter estimates for the Noah land surface model using FLUXNET and machine learning [J].
Chaney, Nathaniel W. ;
Herman, Jonathan D. ;
Ek, Michael B. ;
Wood, Eric F. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (22) :13218-13235
[10]  
Chang W.-Y., 2014, Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, V2, P161, DOI [10.4236/jpee.2014.24023, DOI 10.4236/JPEE.2014.24023]