Quantitative Time-of-Flight Head Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Cerebrovascular Disease

被引:4
|
作者
Koktzoglou, Ioannis [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Ozturk, Onural [1 ,3 ]
Walker, Matthew T. [1 ,2 ]
Ankenbrandt, William J. [1 ,2 ]
Ong, Archie L. [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Ares, William J. [2 ,5 ]
Gil, Fulvio R. [2 ,4 ]
Bulwa, Zachary B. [2 ,4 ]
Edelman, Robert R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Endeavor Hlth, Dept Radiol, Evanston, IL USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Endeavor Hlth, Dept Neurol, Evanston, IL USA
[5] Endeavor Hlth, Dept Neurosurg, Evanston, IL USA
[6] Northwestern Lake Forest Hosp, Dept Neurol, Lake Forest, IL USA
[7] Walgreen Jr Bldg,G507,2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
关键词
head; MRA; quantitative TOF; time-of-flight; phase contrast; cerebrovascular disease; INTRACRANIAL VASCULAR STENOSIS; CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; MR-ANGIOGRAPHY; STROKE RISK; MALFORMATIONS; HEMODYNAMICS; SENSITIVITY; OCCLUSION; ANEURYSMS; ARTERIES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.29395
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Standard Cartesian time-of-flight (TOF) head magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is routinely used to evaluate the intracranial arteries, but does not provide quantitative hemodynamic information that is useful for patient risk stratification as well as for monitoring treatment and tracking changes in blood flow over time. Quantitative TOF (qTOF) MRA represents a new and efficient method for simultaneous evaluating the intracranial arteries and quantifying blood flow velocity, but it has not yet been evaluated in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Purpose: To evaluate qTOF for simultaneously evaluating the intracranial arteries and quantifying intracranial blood flow velocity in patients with cerebrovascular disease, without the need for a phase contrast (PC) scan. Study Type: Prospective. Subjects: Twenty-four patients (18 female, 6 male) with cerebrovascular disease. Field Strength/Sequences: Head MRA at 3 T using gradient-echo 3D qTOF, standard Cartesian TOF, and PC protocols. Assessment: Three independent readers assessed arterial image quality using a 4-point scale (1: non-diagnostic, 4: excellent) and artifact presence. Total and component flow velocities obtained with qTOF and PC were measured. Statistical Tests: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Gwet's AC2, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for absolute agreement, Bland-Altman analyses, tests of equal proportions. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Averaged across readers and compared to standard Cartesian TOF, qTOF significantly improved overall arterial image quality (3.8 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.5), image quality at locations of pathology (3.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.4 +/- 0.7), and increased the proportion of evaluations rated without artifacts (63.9% [46/72] vs. 37.5% [27/72]). qTOF significantly agreed with PC for total flow velocity (ICC = 0.71) and component flow velocity (ICC = 0.89). Data Conclusion: qTOF angiography of the head matched or improved upon the image quality of standard Cartesian TOF, reduced image artifacts, and provided quantitative hemodynamic data, without the need for a PC scan.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 412
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 7 tesla
    Heverhagen, Johannes T.
    Bourekas, Eric
    Sammet, Steffen
    Knopp, Michael V.
    Schmalbrock, Petra
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2008, 43 (08) : 568 - 573
  • [2] Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) of the normal equine head
    Manso-Diaz, G.
    Garcia-Real, M. I.
    Casteleyn, C.
    San-Roman, F.
    Taeymans, O.
    EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2013, 45 (02) : 187 - 192
  • [3] Analysis of Images According to the Fluid Velocity in Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography, and Contrast Enhancement Angiography
    Kim, Eng-Chan
    Heo, Yeong-Cheol
    Cho, Jae-Hwan
    Lee, Hyun-Jeong
    Lee, Hae-Kag
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETICS, 2014, 19 (02) : 185 - 191
  • [4] Visualization of venous systems by time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography
    Ko, Sang B.
    Kim, Dong-Eog
    Kim, Se H.
    Roh, Jae-Kyu
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2006, 16 (04) : 353 - 356
  • [5] Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Stroke Diagnostics Additional Information Compared with Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography?
    Alfke, K.
    Jensen, U.
    Pool, C.
    Rohr, A.
    Bruening, R.
    Weber, J.
    Bartsch, T.
    Stingele, R.
    Jansen, O.
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [6] Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Sparse Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction: Comparison With Conventional Parallel Imaging for Accelerated Imaging
    Yamamoto, Takayuki
    Fujimoto, Koji
    Okada, Tomohisa
    Fushimi, Yasutaka
    Stalder, Aurelien F.
    Natsuaki, Yutaka
    Schmidt, Michaela
    Togashi, Kaori
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2016, 51 (06) : 372 - 378
  • [7] Phase contrast and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracerebral arteries at 1.5, 3 and 7 T
    Stamm, Anna C.
    Wright, Chadwick L.
    Knopp, Michael V.
    Schmalbrock, Petra
    Heverhagen, Johannes T.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 31 (04) : 545 - 549
  • [8] Analysis of Enlarged Images Using Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Computed Tomography, and Conventional Angiography
    Heo, Yeong-Cheol
    Lee, Hae-Kag
    Yang, Han-Jun
    Cho, Jae-Hwan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2014, 38 (12)
  • [9] Superior Visualization of Neovascularization with Silent Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared to Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography After Bypass Surgery in Moyamoya Disease
    Suzuki, Tomoaki
    Hasegawa, Hitoshi
    Okamoto, Kouichirou
    Shibuya, Kohei
    Takahashi, Haruhiko
    Fujiwara, Hidemoto
    Oishi, Makoto
    Fujii, Yukihiko
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 175 : E1292 - E1299
  • [10] Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries
    Al-Kwifi, O
    Emery, DJ
    Wilman, AH
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 20 (02) : 181 - 187