Adverse event assessment in a parenting programme: experiences from a multisite randomised controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Frantz, Inga [1 ,12 ]
Foran, Heather M. [2 ]
Lachman, Jamie M. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Gardner, Frances [3 ]
McMahon, Robert J. [6 ,7 ]
Ogden, Terje [8 ]
Hutchings, Judy [9 ]
Costin, Madalina Ruxandra [10 ]
Kunovski, Ivo [11 ]
Raleva, Marija [11 ]
Mueller, Janina [2 ]
Heinrichs, Nina [12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Inst Psychol, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Klagenfurt, Inst Psychol, Klagenfurt, Austria
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Social Policy & Intervent, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Glasgow, Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, Glasgow, Scotland
[5] Univ Cape Town, Ctr Social Sci Res, Cape Town, South Africa
[6] Simon Fraser Univ, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[7] BC Childrens Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[8] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Ctr Child Behav Dev, Oslo, Norway
[9] Bangor Univ, Sch Psychol, Bangor, Wales
[10] Babes Bolyai Univ, Dept Psychol, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[11] Inst Marriage Family & Syst Practice ALTERNAT, Skopje, North Macedonia
[12] Univ Bremen, Dept Psychol Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Bremen, Germany
[13] Bielefeld Univ, Dept Psychol, Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
Harms; Adverse events; Negative effect; Parenting programme; Prevention; INTERVENTIONS; HARM; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-024-08357-6
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundClinicians and researchers should consider the expected benefits and potential harms of an intervention. Parenting programmes are a widely used evidence-based intervention for child behaviour problems. However, few data are available on potential negative effects. The aims of this paper were to increase systematic knowledge of adverse event (AE) assessment in parenting programmes and to provide an AE assessment tool.MethodsAs part of the RISE project (prevention of child mental health problems in South-eastern Europe-adapt, optimise, test and extend parenting for lifelong health), we developed and tested an AE assessment procedure in three sequential studies for parents of children with child behaviour problems aged 2 to 9 years in North Macedonia, Republic of Moldova, and Romania. This paper reports on the development of the assessment tool in phase 1 (N = 140), phase 2 (N = 835), and the final experiences with using the optimised procedures in phase 3 (multisite randomised controlled trial, N = 823) in which AEs were assessed before, three times during intervention delivery, and at 1 year follow-up. At each time point, the participants completed a 12-item AE checklist. If moderate-to-severe problems of parent or child were reported, a structured follow-up interview was conducted.ResultsThe response rate on the AE assessment tool increased from 6% (phase 1) to 100% (phase 3) indicating improvement in collecting these data based on the experiences of each phase. Results of the RCT (phase 3) showed generally low (S)AE frequencies with the finally optimised procedure: During the intervention, no serious adverse events (SAE) were registered; at least one AE was reported by 10% (after the first session), 7% (after the third session), and 4% (after the last fifth session) of participants. None of the identified (S)AEs was causally related to the study or intervention. Cost-benefit considerations are needed to determine the best way to ensure participant safety in parenting programmes.ConclusionThe applied active AE assessment procedure provides a comprehensive AE assessment tool that can be used by others-with adaptations for the specific context, if needed. Based on our experiences, we outline recommendations for future studies.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, registration number phase 1: NCT03552250; phase 2: NCT03865485, phase 3: NCT04721730. Registered on 13 January 2021.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Achenbach T. M., 2001, Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles
  • [2] Allan C., 2018, ADHD Rep, DOI [10.1521/adhd.2018.26.1.4, DOI 10.1521/ADHD.2018.26.1.4, DOI 10.1521/adhd.2018.26.1.4]
  • [3] Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report
    Appelbaum, Mark
    Cooper, Harris
    Kline, Rex B.
    Mayo-Wilson, Evan
    Nezu, Arthur M.
    Rao, Stephen M.
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 73 (01) : 3 - 25
  • [4] First do no harm: Adverse effects of grouping deviant youth for skills training
    Arnold, ME
    Hughes, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 37 (01) : 99 - 115
  • [5] The Effectiveness of Parenting Programs: A Review of Campbell Reviews
    Barlow, Jane
    Coren, Esther
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2018, 28 (01) : 99 - 102
  • [6] Effect of Parent Training vs Parent Education on Behavioral Problems in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Bearss, Karen
    Johnson, Cynthia
    Smith, Tristram
    Lecavalier, Luc
    Swiezy, Naomi
    Aman, Michael
    McAdam, David B.
    Butter, Eric
    Stillitano, Charmaine
    Minshawi, Noha
    Sukhodolsky, Denis G.
    Mruzek, Daniel W.
    Turner, Kylan
    Neal, Tiffany
    Hallett, Victoria
    Mulick, James A.
    Green, Bryson
    Handen, Benjamin
    Deng, Yanhong
    Dziura, James
    Scahill, Lawrence
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (15): : 1524 - 1533
  • [7] Promoting parent-child relationships and preventing violence via home-visiting: a pre-post cluster randomised trial among Rwandan families linked to social protection programmes
    Betancourt, Theresa S.
    Jensen, Sarah K. G.
    Barnhart, Dale A.
    Brennan, Robert T.
    Murray, Shauna M.
    Yousafzai, Aisha K.
    Farrar, Jordan
    Godfroid, Kalisa
    Bazubagira, Stephanie M.
    Rawlings, Laura B.
    Wilson, Briana
    Sezibera, Vincent
    Kamurase, Alex
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [8] 'Dark logic': theorising the harmful consequences of public health interventions
    Bonell, Chris
    Jamal, Farah
    Melendez-Torres, G. J.
    Cummins, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2015, 69 (01) : 95 - 98
  • [10] Cianchetti Carlo, 2013, Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health, V9, P51, DOI 10.2174/1745017901309010051