Research on Quantitative Assessment Method for Fire Spread Risk in Enclosed Buildings

被引:3
作者
Sun, Haodong [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Jihong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Jiangsu Key Lab Environm Impact & Struct Safety En, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Xuzhou Key Lab Fire Safety Engn Struct, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Enclosed buildings; Fire spread; Risk assessment; Domino effect; Prediction model; MODEL; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10694-024-01588-8
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The main objective of this research is to establish a quantitative risk assessment method for fire spread in enclosed building scenarios. The enclosed building fire spread process is divided into three stages: fire fully developed in the fire compartment, failure of weak barrier, and combustibles ignited in the target compartment. The calculation method for fire spread is established, where the time for fire fully developed is calculated based on the t2 fire, the barrier failure time is calculated based on the finite difference method, and the combustible ignition time is calculated based on the zone model. The linear regression model is formulated to ensure computational efficiency for fire spread time prediction. The enclosed building fire spread quantitative risk assessment method is proposed based on the Probit model. The effectiveness of the risk assessment method is validated through the enclosed building fire spread experiment, and the method is applied to assess the risk of fire spread in an office. The results demonstrate that the method could quantitatively assess fire spread risk under different conditions with high computational efficiency and excellent versatility, and it could provide guidance for fire prevention, building fire design, and fire rescue.
引用
收藏
页码:3709 / 3738
页数:30
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, Probabilistic Model Code-Part 2: Load Models (2.01 Self Weight)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, EN 1991-1-2, Eurocode 1
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer
  • [4] Babrauskas V., 2002, J FIRE PROT ENG, V12, P163, DOI [DOI 10.1177/10423910260620482, 10.1177/10423910260620482]
  • [5] CEN, 2004, 1995 1 2 EUROCODE 5
  • [6] Dynamic modeling of fire spread in building
    Cheng, Hao
    Hadjisophocleous, George V.
    [J]. FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2011, 46 (04) : 211 - 224
  • [7] The modeling of fire spread in buildings by Bayesian network
    Cheng, Hao
    Hadjisophocleous, George V.
    [J]. FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2009, 44 (06) : 901 - 908
  • [8] The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis
    Cozzani, V
    Gubinelli, G
    Antonioni, G
    Spadoni, G
    Zanelli, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2005, 127 (1-3) : 14 - 30
  • [9] A critical review of "travelling fire" scenarios for performance-based structural engineering
    Dai, Xu
    Welch, Stephen
    Usmani, Asif
    [J]. FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2017, 91 : 568 - 578
  • [10] Deguchi Y., 2011, Fire Safety Science, V10, P1087, DOI DOI 10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.10-1087