Misinformation poses a bigger threat to democracy than you might think

被引：22

作者：

Ecker U. ^{[1
]}

Roozenbeek J. ^{[2
]}

van der Linden S. ^{[3
]}

Tay L.Q. ^{[4
]}

Cook J. ^{[5
]}

Oreskes N. ^{[6
]}

Lewandowsky S. ^{[7
,8
]}

机构：

[1] School of Psychological Science, Public Policy Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth

[2] Department of War Studies, King’s College London

[3] School of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra

[4] Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

来源：

Nature | 2024年 / 630卷 / 8015期

基金：

英国经济与社会研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”; 欧洲研究理事会; 英国科研创新办公室;

关键词：

Communication; Government; Policy; Politics;

D O I：

10.1038/d41586-024-01587-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In today’s polarized political climate, researchers who combat mistruths have come under attack and been labelled as unelected arbiters of truth. But the fight against misinformation is valid, warranted and urgently required. © Springer Nature Limited 2024.

引用

页码：29 / 32

页数：3

共 19 条

[1] Lewandowsky S., Et al., Technology and Democracy: Understanding the Influence of Online Technologies on Political Behaviour and Decision-Making, (2020)
[2] Lewandowsky S., Et al., Curr. Opin. Psychol, 54, (2023)
[3] van der Linden S., Et al., Using Psychological Science to Understand and Fight Health Misinformation: An APA Consensus Statement, (2023)
[4] Kozyreva A., Et al., Nature Hum. Behav, (2024)
[5] Adams Z., Osman M., Bechlivanidis C., Meder B., Perspect. Psychol. Sci, 18, pp. 1436-1463, (2023)
[6] Bretter C., Schulz F., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 120, (2023)
[7] Freiling I., Krause N.M., Scheufele D.A., AMA J. Ethics, 25, pp. 228-237, (2023)
[8] Krause N.M., Freiling I., Scheufele D.A., Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci, 700, pp. 112-123, (2022)
[9] Uscinski J., Littrell S., Klofstad C., Curr. Opin. Psychol, 57, (2024)
[10] van Doorn M., Inquiry, (2023)

← 1 2 →