A prospective, randomized, single-blinded study comparing the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Wenyou [1 ]
Wang, Liangrong [1 ]
Zhu, Na [1 ]
Wu, Wenzhi [2 ]
Liu, Haiyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Shangcai Village,Nanbaixiang Town,Ouhai Dist, Wenzhou 325000, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastroenterol, Wenzhou 325000, Peoples R China
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Propofol; Sedation-related adverse events; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; ERCP; MIDAZOLAM; REMIFENTANIL; COMBINATION; ANESTHESIA; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-024-02572-z
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Balanced propofol sedation is extensively used in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs) are common. In various clinical settings, the combination of dexmedetomidine with opioids and benzodiazepines has provided effective sedation with increased safety. The aim of this investigation was to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation during ERCP. Methods Forty-one patients were randomly divided into two groups: the dexmedetomidine (DEX) group and the propofol (PRO) group. Patients in the DEX group received an additional bolus of 0.6 mu g kg(-1) dexmedetomidine followed by a dexmedetomidine infusion at 1.2 mu g kg(-1) h(-1), whereas the PRO group received 1-2 mg kg(-1) of propofol bolus followed by a propofol infusion at 2-3 mg kg(-1) h(-1). During ERCP, the primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia (SpO(2) < 90% for > 10 s). Other intraoperative adverse events were also recorded as secondary outcomes, including respiratory depression (respiratory rate of < 10 bpm min(-1)), hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg), and bradycardia (HR < 45 beats min(-1)). Results The incidence of hypoxemia was significantly reduced in the DEX group compared to the PRO group (0% versus 28.6%, respectively; P = 0.032). Patients in the PRO group exhibited respiratory depression more frequently than patients in the DEX group (35% versus 81%, respectively; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in terms of hypotension and bradycardia episodes between groups. During the procedures, the satisfaction scores of endoscopists and patients, as well as the pain and procedure memory scores of patients were comparable between groups. Conclusion In comparison with propofol, dexmedetomidine provided adequate sedation safety with no adverse effects on sedation efficacy during ERCP.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dexmedetomidine or midazolam in combination with propofol for sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized double blind prospective study
    Koruk, Senem
    Koruk, Irfan
    Arslan, Ayse Mizrak
    Bilgi, Murat
    Gul, Rauf
    Bozgeyik, Semsettin
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2020, 15 (03) : 526 - 532
  • [2] Effectiveness of single loading dose of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol for deep sedation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in elderly patients: a prospective randomized study
    Chen, Mo
    Sun, Yi
    Li, Xueyan
    Zhang, Chun
    Huang, Xiaochen
    Xu, Yiming
    Gu, Chengyong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [3] Effectiveness of single loading dose of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol for deep sedation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in elderly patients: a prospective randomized study
    Mo Chen
    Yi Sun
    Xueyan Li
    Chun Zhang
    Xiaochen Huang
    Yiming Xu
    Chengyong Gu
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [4] Sedation and safety of propofol for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Digestive Department (Chen WX
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2005, (03) : 437 - 440
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of endoscopist-directed balanced propofol sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Lapidus, Alon
    Gralnek, Ian M.
    Suissa, Alain
    Yassin, Kamel
    Khamaysi, Iyad
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 32 (03): : 303 - 311
  • [6] Feasibility and safety of deep sedation with propofol and remifentanil in spontaneous breathing during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: an observational prospective study
    De Vico, Pasquale
    Biasucci, Daniele G.
    Aversano, Lucia
    Polidoro, Roberto
    Zingaro, Alessia
    Millarelli, Francesca Romana
    Blanco, Giovanna Del Vecchio
    Paoluzi, Omero Alessandro
    Troncone, Edoardo
    Monteleone, Giovanni
    Dauri, Mario
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [7] Feasibility and safety of deep sedation with propofol and remifentanil in spontaneous breathing during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: an observational prospective study
    Pasquale De Vico
    Daniele G. Biasucci
    Lucia Aversano
    Roberto Polidoro
    Alessia Zingaro
    Francesca Romana Millarelli
    Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco
    Omero Alessandro Paoluzi
    Edoardo Troncone
    Giovanni Monteleone
    Mario Dauri
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Propofol-Mediated Sedation for Outpatient Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
    Yang, Juliana F.
    Farooq, Priya
    Zwilling, Kate
    Patel, Devi
    Siddiqui, Ali A.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2016, 61 (06) : 1686 - 1691
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Propofol-Mediated Sedation for Outpatient Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
    Juliana F. Yang
    Priya Farooq
    Kate Zwilling
    Devi Patel
    Ali A. Siddiqui
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2016, 61 : 1686 - 1691
  • [10] Efficacy of a Dexmedetomidine–Remifentanil Combination Compared with a Midazolam–Remifentanil Combination for Conscious Sedation During Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded Preliminary Trial
    Zhiqiang Lu
    Wenyuan Li
    Huiyu Chen
    Yanning Qian
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2018, 63 : 1633 - 1640