Post-intensive care syndrome screening: a French multicentre survey

被引:2
|
作者
Agbakou, Maite [1 ]
Combet, Margot [2 ]
Martin, Maelle [1 ]
Blonz, Gauthier [1 ]
Desmedt, Luc [1 ]
Seguin, Amelie [1 ]
Lemarie, Jeremie [1 ]
Zambon, Olivier [1 ]
Reignier, Jean [3 ]
Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Ehrmann, Stephan [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Canet, Emmanuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Nantes Univ, Nantes Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, 30 Bd Jean Monnet, F-44093 Nantes 1, France
[2] Kremlin Bicetre Univ Hosp, AP HP, Intens Care Unit, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[3] Nantes Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Movement Interact Performance Res Unit MIP, MIP,UR 4334, Nantes, France
[4] Tours Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Tours, France
[5] Tours Univ, Tours Univ Hosp, INSERM CIC 1415, Tours, France
[6] Tours Univ, Res Ctr Resp Dis, INSERM, U1100, Tours, France
[7] Clin Res Intens Care & Sepsis Trial Grp Global Eva, Tours, France
来源
ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Intensive care unit; Survey; France; Post-intensive care syndrome; Disability; Screening; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; TERM COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; SURVIVORS; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; UNIT; DYSFUNCTION; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1186/s13613-024-01341-y
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundPost-intensive care syndrome (PICS), defined as physical, cognitive, and mental-health symptoms persisting long after intensive-care-unit (ICU) discharge, is increasingly recognised as a healthcare priority. Data on screening for PICS are sparse. Our objective here was to describe post-ICU screening in France, with special attention to visit availability and evaluations done during visits.MethodsWe conducted an online multicentre survey by emailing an anonymous 43-item questionnaire to French ICUs. For each ICU, a single survey was sent to either the head or the intensivist in charge of follow-up visits.ResultsOf 252 ICUs invited to participate, 161 (63.9%) returned the completed survey. Among them, 46 (28.6%) offered follow-up visits. Usually, a single visit led by an intensivist was scheduled 3 to 6 months after ICU discharge. Approximately 50 patients/year/ICU, that is, about 5% of admitted patients, attended post-ICU visits. The main criteria used to select patients for follow-up were ICU stay and/or invasive mechanical ventilation duration longer than 48 h, cardiac arrest, septic shock, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Among ICUs offering visits, 80% used validated instruments to screen for PICS. Of the 115 ICUs not offering follow-up, 50 (43.5%) indicated an intention to start follow-up within the next year. The main barriers to offering follow-up were lack of available staff and equipment or not viewing PICS screening as a priority. Half the ICUs offering visits worked with an established network of post-ICU care professionals, and another 17% were setting up such a network. Obstacles to network creation were lack of interest among healthcare professionals and lack of specific training in PICS.ConclusionOnly a small minority of ICU survivors received follow-up designed to detect PICS. Less than a third of ICUs offered follow-up visits but nearly another third planned to set up such visits within the next year. Recommendations issued by French health authorities in 2023 can be expected to improve the availability and standardisation of post-ICU follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Post-intensive care screening: French translation and validation of the Healthy Aging Brain Care-Monitor, hybrid version
    Horlait, Geoffrey
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Bougard, Laurine
    Bornheim, Stephen
    Colson, Camille
    Misset, Benoit
    Bruyere, Olivier
    Boustani, Malaz
    Rousseau, Anne-Francoise
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [42] Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): recent updates
    Hiser, Stephanie L. L.
    Fatima, Arooj
    Ali, Mazin
    Needham, Dale M. M.
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [43] Post-Intensive Care Unit Syndrome in a Cohort of COVID-19 Survivors in New York City
    Weidman, Karissa
    LaFond, Elyse
    Hoffman, Katherine L.
    Goyal, Parag
    Parkhurst, Christopher N.
    Derry-Vick, Heather
    Schenck, Edward
    Lief, Lindsay
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2022, 19 (07) : 1158 - 1168
  • [44] Risk factors for post-intensive care syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Minju
    Kang, Jiyeon
    Jeong, Yeon Jin
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 33 (03) : 287 - 294
  • [45] Could type 2 diabetes be a component of the post-intensive care syndrome?
    Preiser, Jean-Charles
    de Longueville, Caroline
    CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 21
  • [46] Review: Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: Unique Challenges in the Neurointensive Care Unit
    LaBuzetta, Jamie Nicole
    Rosand, Jonathan
    Vranceanu, Ana-Maria
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2019, 31 (03) : 534 - 545
  • [47] Quality of life in ICU survivors and their relatives with post-intensive care syndrome: A systematic review
    Gravante, Francesco
    Trotta, Francesca
    Latina, Salvatore
    Simeone, Silvio
    Alvaro, Rosaria
    Vellone, Ercole
    Pucciarelli, Gianluca
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 29 (04) : 807 - 823
  • [48] Socio-Ecologic Perspective: Barriers Complicating Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Mitigation
    Zbar, Ross I. S.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [49] Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Preventing Complications and Improving Long-Term Outcomes
    Scruth, Elizabeth A.
    CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2014, 28 (01) : 9 - 11
  • [50] Clinical Comparison of Post-intensive Care Syndrome and Long Coronavirus Disease
    Vrettou, Charikleia S.
    Jolley, Sarah E.
    Mantziou, Vassiliki
    Dimopoulou, Ioanna
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2025, 41 (01) : 89 - 102