Comparison of BlockBuster laryngeal mask with Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for fiber-optic guided intubation in children: A prospective randomized controlled study

被引:0
作者
Soni, Lipika [1 ]
Kumar, Kanil Ranjith [1 ]
Sinha, Renu [1 ]
Ayub, Arshad [1 ]
Patel, Nishant [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol Pain Med & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
关键词
AGE; child; Airway; EQUIPMENT; airway devices; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; MANAGEMENT; INFANTS; LMA;
D O I
10.1111/pan.14906
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe pediatric sizes of BlockBuster supraglottic airway (SGA) have been introduced recently. Its efficacy as a conduit for endotracheal intubation in children has not been assessed. Newer devices are often compared with Air-Q SGA to assess their intubating capability. AimsThe primary objective was to compare the time taken for fiber-optic-guided intubation through the BlockBuster and the Air-Q SGAs. MethodsSixty children aged 6 months to 12 years with normal airways were randomized into two groups: Air-Q SGA (Group A) and Blockbuster SGA (Group B). After administration of general anesthesia, an appropriately sized SGA was inserted. The time taken for fiber-optic-guided intubation through the SGA, success, ease, and time for SGA insertion and removal were noted. The glottic view was graded by fiber-optic bronchoscopy. ResultsDemographic parameters were comparable. The time to intubate with the BlockBuster 62.40 +/- 17.2 s was comparable to the Air-Q 60.8 +/- 18.5 s (mean difference 1.6 s, 95% CI -7.65 to10.85; p = .73). The average time for SGA insertion in BlockBuster and Air-Q was 14.57 +/- 3.2 s and 16.67 +/- 5.39 s, respectively (mean difference -2.1, 95% CI -4.39 to 0.19 s; p = .07). The first-attempt intubation success and overall intubation success rates were comparable in both groups, 96.7% and 100%, respectively. In Group B, 25/3/1/1/0 cases had a glottic view grade of 1/2/3/4/5, respectively. In Group A, 23/3/2/2/0 cases had grade of 1/2/3/4/5 glottic views respectively. The average time to SGA removal was comparable between the BlockBuster (20.17 +/- 5.8 s) and the Air-Q (22.5 +/- 12.8 s) groups (mean difference -2.3 s, 95% CI -7.5 to 2.82 s; p = .37). None of the children had any perioperative complications. ConclusionBlockBuster SGA may be a useful alternative to Air-Q for SGA-assisted, fiber-optic-guided tracheal intubation in children.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 677
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Comparative Efficacy of the Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway during General Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ahn, Eun Jin
    Choi, Geun Joo
    Kang, Hyun
    Baek, Chong Wha
    Jung, Yong Hun
    Woo, Young Cheol
    Bang, Si Ra
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [2] Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster® versus Fastrach® LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial
    Endigeri, Archana
    Ganeshnavar, Anilkumar
    Varaprasad, B. V. S.
    Shivanand, Y. H.
    Ayyangouda, Basavaraja
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 63 (12) : 988 - 994
  • [3] Fiadjoe John, 2009, Anesthesiol Clin, V27, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.anclin.2009.06.002
  • [4] Comparison of the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway and the cobra perilaryngeal airway as conduits for fiber optic-guided intubation in pediatric patients
    Girgis, Karim K.
    Youssef, Maha M. I.
    ElZayyat, Nashwa S.
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 8 (04) : 470 - 476
  • [5] A randomised comparison of the Ambu® AuraGain and the LMA® supreme in infants and children
    Jagannathan, N.
    Hajduk, J.
    Sohn, L.
    Huang, A.
    Sawardekar, A.
    Gebhardt, E. R.
    Johnson, K.
    De Oliveira, G. S.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (02) : 205 - 212
  • [6] A randomized trial comparing the Ambu® Aura-i™ with the air-Q™ intubating laryngeal airway as conduits for tracheal intubation in children
    Jagannathan, Narasimhan
    Sohn, Lisa E.
    Sawardekar, Amod
    Gordon, Jason
    Shah, Ravi D.
    Mukherji, Isabella I.
    Roth, Andrew G.
    Suresh, Santhanam
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 22 (12) : 1197 - 1204
  • [7] A cohort evaluation of the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Supreme™ in children
    Jagannathan, Narasimhan
    Sohn, Lisa E.
    Chang, Edwina
    Sawardekar, Amod
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 22 (08) : 759 - 764
  • [8] Retrospective audit of the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients with a difficult airway
    Jagannathan, Narasimhan
    Kho, Melanie F.
    Kozlowski, Ryan J.
    Sohn, Lisa E.
    Siddiqui, Aisha
    Wong, David T.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 21 (04) : 422 - 427
  • [9] A Clinical Evaluation of the Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation in Children
    Jagannathan, Narasimhan
    Kozlowski, Ryan J.
    Sohn, Lisa E.
    Langen, Kenneth E.
    Roth, Andrew G.
    Mukherji, Isabella I.
    Kho, Melanie F.
    Suresh, Santhanam
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (01) : 176 - 182
  • [10] Comparison of blind tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA Fastrach™) and the Air-Q™
    Karim, Y. M.
    Swanson, D. E.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (03) : 185 - 190