A retrospective budget impact analysis of fidaxomicin treatment for Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) in Germany

被引:0
作者
Siefen, Ann-Cathrine [1 ]
Kurte, Melina Sophie [1 ,2 ]
Bauer, Anna Marie [1 ]
Cornely, Oliver A. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Wingen-Heimann, Sebastian [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,10 ]
Kron, Florian [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] VITIS Healthcare Grp, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Fac Med, Essen, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med 1, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Ctr Integrated Oncol CIO ABCD, Cologne, Germany
[6] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Clin Trials Ctr Cologne ZKS Koln, Cologne, Germany
[7] Univ Hosp Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[8] Univ Cologne, Inst Translat Res, Fac Med, Cologne, Germany
[9] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Excellence Ctr Med Mycol ECMM, Cologne, Germany
[10] FOM Univ Appl Sci, Competence Ctr Med Econ, Essen, Germany
[11] FOM Univ Appl Sci, Leimkugelstr 6, D-45141 Essen, Germany
关键词
Budget impact analysis; fidaxomicin; recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection; vancomycin; health economics; Clostridioides difficile; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC BURDEN; VANCOMYCIN; MANAGEMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; DIARRHEA;
D O I
10.1080/14737167.2024.2352005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Clostridioides difficile is the most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea. Research suggests that treating C. difficile infections (CDI) with fidaxomicin (FDX) is more effective than vancomycin (VAN), with potential cost savings. The objective was to calculate the budget impact of FDX treatment compared to VAN from a German payer perspective. Research design and methods: The analysis used real-world data of patients discharged from University Hospital Cologne between Jan-01-2018 and Dec-31-2019. We identified recurrent and non-recurrent CDI cases and calculated direct treatment costs based on G-DRG flat rates. To calculate average costs per treatment and the budget impact, recurrence probabilities for VAN and FDX were taken from published evidence (28-day and 90-day scenarios). Results: Totally, 475 cases were analyzed, thereof 421 non-recurrent, causing mean costs of <euro>32,901 per case (95% CI: 27.752-38.050). Thirty-two patients experienced a recurrence within 28 days, yielding mean costs of <euro>10,952 (95% CI: 5.627-16.277) for their additional hospital stay. The resulting budget impact was <euro>1,303 (95% CI: 670-1.937) in favor of FDX, ranging from <euro>148.34 to <euro>2,190.30 in scenario analyses. Conclusion: The analysis indicates FDX treatment can lead to cost savings compared to VAN. Future research should focus on specific patient groups, such as refractory CDI patients.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 942
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] Ministerium des Innern des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, GESETZ ZUM SCHUTZ PE
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness analysis of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in Clostridium difficile infection
    Nathwani, Dilip
    Cornely, Oliver A.
    Van Engen, Anke K.
    Odufowora-Sita, Olatunji
    Retsa, Peny
    Odeyemi, Isaac A. O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 69 (11) : 2901 - 2912
  • [33] The rise in Clostridium difficile infection incidence among hospitalized adults in the United States: 2001-2010
    Reveles, Kelly R.
    Lee, Grace C.
    Boyd, Natalie K.
    Frei, Christopher R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2014, 42 (10) : 1028 - 1032
  • [34] Economic burden of primary compared with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients: a prospective cohort study
    Shah, D. N.
    Aitken, S. L.
    Barragan, L. F.
    Bozorgui, S.
    Goddu, S.
    Navarro, M. E.
    Xie, Y.
    DuPont, H. L.
    Garey, K. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2016, 93 (03) : 286 - 289
  • [35] Fidaxomicin Compared With Oral Vancomycin for the Treatment of SevereClostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea: A Retrospective Review
    Summers, Bryant B.
    Yates, Mary
    Cleveland, Kerry O.
    Gelfand, Michael S.
    Usery, Justin
    [J]. HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2020, 55 (04) : 268 - 272
  • [36] A cost-utility analysis of two Clostridioides difficile infection guideline treatment pathways
    Swart, Nicholas
    Sinha, Araadhna M.
    Bentley, Anthony
    Smethurst, Helen
    Spencer, Gordon
    Ceder, Sophia
    Wilcox, Mark H.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2023, 29 (10) : 1291 - 1297
  • [37] European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults
    van Prehn, Joffrey
    Reigadas, Elena
    Vogelzang, Erik H.
    Bouza, Emilio
    Hristea, Adriana
    Guery, Benoit
    Krutova, Marcela
    Noren, Torbjorn
    Allerberger, Franz
    Coia, John E.
    Goorhuis, Abraham
    van Rossen, Tessel M.
    Ooijevaar, Rogier E.
    Burns, Karen
    Olesen, Bente R. Scharvik
    Tschudin-Sutter, Sarah
    Wilcox, Mark H.
    Vehreschild, Maria J. G. T.
    Fitzpatrick, Fidelma
    Kuijper, Ed J.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 : S1 - S21
  • [38] Treatment failure and recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection following treatment with vancomycin or metronidazole: a systematic review of the evidence
    Vardakas, Konstantinos Z.
    Polyzos, Konstantinos A.
    Patouni, Konstantina
    Rafailidis, Petros I.
    Samonis, George
    Falagas, Matthew E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2012, 40 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of fidaxomicin and vancomycin to treat Clostridium difficile infection in France
    Watt, Maureen
    Dinh, Aur Elien
    Le Monnier, Alban
    Tilleul, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (07) : 678 - 686
  • [40] A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany
    Watt, Maureen
    McCrea, Charles
    Johal, Sukhvinder
    Posnett, John
    Nazir, Jameel
    [J]. INFECTION, 2016, 44 (05) : 599 - 606