Evaluation of the practice of reprocessing ORs in German hospitals from an infection prevention and control perspective

被引:0
作者
Grimm, C. [1 ]
Scheithauer, S. [2 ]
Artelt, T. [2 ]
Stieber, A. [1 ]
Erlenwein, J. [1 ]
Schuster, M. [3 ]
Bauer, M. [4 ]
Waeschle, Reiner M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Anesthesiol, Robert Koch Str 40, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Infect Control & Infect Dis, Gottingen, Germany
[3] RKH Kliniken Landkreis Karlsruhe, Furst Stirum Klin Bruchsal & Rechbergklin Bretten, Clin Anesthesiol Intens Care Med Emergency Med & P, Bruchsal, Germany
[4] RHON KLINIKUM Campus Bad Neustadt, Clin Anesthesiol Intens Care Med & OR Management, Bad Neustadt An Der Saale, Germany
关键词
Infection prevention and control; Reprocessing; OR; Disinfection; Survey; SURGERY; HYGIENE; IMPLEMENTATION; MORTALITY; MORBIDITY; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s15010-024-02303-z
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to analyze the cleaning and disinfection of operating rooms (ORs) status quo focusing on hygiene plans in German hospitals. Methods In 2016, a structured online survey was sent to infection prevention and control (IPC) specialists at the cost calculation hospitals of the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) and all university hospitals in Germany (n = 365). Results With a response rate of 27.4%, 78% stated that written hygiene plans were available. After cleaning and disinfecting an OR with a "septic" patient, 55% waited until surfaces were dry before reusing in accordance with national recommendations, 27% waited > 30 min. Additionally, 28% of hospitals had ORs only for "septic" patients. In 56% "septic" patients were only operated on at the end of the program. Postoperative monitoring of patients with bacteria with special IPC requirements took place in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) (29%), operating room (OR) (52%), intensive care unit (ICU) (53%), and in the intermediate care unit (IMC) (19%). Discussion and conclusions Despite written hygiene plans in place the partly long duration of OR nonuse time following IPC measures, the consistent continued use of stratification for "septic" patients and the postoperative follow-up care of patients with colonizing/infecting bacteria with special IPC requirements in the OR and high care areas represent relevant potential for improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:1575 / 1584
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Anderson DJ., 2014, J SOC HOSP EPIDEMIOL, V35, p605 27, DOI [10.1086/676022, DOI 10.1086/676022]
  • [3] Bauer M, 2015, ANAESTHESIST, V64, P765, DOI 10.1007/s00101-015-0086-7
  • [4] Bhling A., 2003, DTSCH RZTEBL, V100, pC263
  • [5] The Separation of Septic and Aseptic Surgical Areas is Obsolete
    Bischoff, Peter
    Gastmeier, Petra
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 114 (27-28): : 463 - 464
  • [6] Does Late Night Hip Surgery Affect Outcome?
    Chacko, Aron T.
    Ramirez, Miguel A.
    Ramappa, Arun J.
    Richardson, Lars C.
    Appleton, Paul T.
    Rodriguez, Edward K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 71 (02): : 447 - 453
  • [7] Commentary by the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection, 2024, EPID B, P3
  • [8] Commission for hospital hygiene and infection prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch-Institute, HYGIENE PLAN
  • [9] Commission for hospital hygiene and infection prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch-Institute, 2007, BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLA, V50, P377, DOI [10.1007/s00103-007-0167-0, DOI 10.1007/S00103-007-0167-0]
  • [10] Diemer M, 2023, OPERATING THEATRE MA