Influence of psychological and personal factors on predicting individual's thermal comfort in an office building using linear estimation and machine learning model

被引:1
作者
Nafiz, Muhammad [1 ]
Zaki, Sheikh Ahmad [1 ]
Nadarajah, Pravin Diliban [2 ]
Singh, Manoj Kumar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Malaysia Japan Int Inst Technol, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
[2] Shiv Nadar Inst Eminence, Dept Civil Engn, Energy & Sustainable Built Environm Design ESBD La, Greater Noida, India
关键词
Thermal comfort; office building; machine learning; linear estimation; psychological parameters; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; SKIN TEMPERATURE; SENSATION; ENVIRONMENTS; PRODUCTIVITY; PERCEPTION; INSIGHTS; BEHAVIOR; GENDER; PMV;
D O I
10.1080/17512549.2024.2340449
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Thermal comfort in the building affects occupants' health, productivity, and electricity use. Predicting occupants' thermal comfort in advance will be helpful. Nowadays, a widely used model for thermal comfort prediction is the predicted mean vote (PMV). However, studies have found discrepancies between PMV and thermal sensation votes. In this paper, a comparative study was made by developing thermal comfort prediction in office building models using linear estimation and machine learning (ML) algorithms. Fanger's six parameters and nine other parameters are considered for linear estimation and ML input parameters. These parameters are divided into two groups: the psychology group with the parameter's thermal preference, thermal acceptance, overall comfort, air movement vote, humidity preference, and humidity vote, and the personal group with the parameters of gender and age. The predictive model developed showed the validated coefficient of correlation of more than 0.88 for both categories. For ML, training and evaluation have been done for five ML models: Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), and K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN). The findings showed that new parameters made significantly better thermal comfort prediction. RF has the lowest prediction average error, 0.706 when including all the psychological group parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 125
页数:21
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Al horr Yousef, 2016, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, V5, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.006
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1992, ASHRAE Standard Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy
  • [3] Thermal comfort in residential buildings - Failure to predict by Standard model
    Becker, R.
    Paciuk, M.
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 44 (05) : 948 - 960
  • [4] Using machine learning algorithms to predict occupants' thermal comfort in naturally ventilated residential buildings
    Chai, Qian
    Wang, Huiqin
    Zhai, Yongchao
    Yang, Liu
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 217
  • [5] A feedforward neural network based indoor-climate control framework for thermal comfort and energy saving in buildings
    Chaudhuri, Tanaya
    Soh, Yeng Chai
    Li, Hua
    Xie, Lihua
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 248 (44-53) : 44 - 53
  • [6] Thermal comfort prediction using normalized skin temperature in a uniform built environment
    Chaudhuri, Tanaya
    Zhai, Deqing
    Soh, Yeng Chai
    Li, Hua
    Xie, Lihua
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 159 : 426 - 440
  • [7] Analysis of the accuracy on PMV - PPD model using the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II
    Cheung, Toby
    Schiavon, Stefano
    Parkinson, Thomas
    Li, Peixian
    Brager, Gail
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 153 : 205 - 217
  • [8] Investigation of the possibility of the use of heart rate as a human factor for thermal sensation models
    Choi, Joon-Ho
    Loftness, Vivian
    Lee, Dong-Won
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 50 : 165 - 175
  • [9] Field study on adaptive thermal comfort in office buildings in Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, and Japan during hot and humid season
    Damiati, Siti Aisyah
    Zaki, Sheikh Ahmad
    Rijal, Hom Bahadur
    Wonorahardjo, Surjamanto
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 109 : 208 - 223
  • [10] de Dear R.J., 1994, ASHRAE T, V100, P457