Risk Factors for Recurrence After Surgery for Rectal Cancer in a Modern, Nationwide Population-Based Cohort

被引:1
|
作者
Doroudian, Sepehr [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Osterman, Erik [1 ,4 ]
Glimelius, Bengt [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Immunol Genet & Pathol, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ Reg Gavleborg, Ctr Res & Dev, Gavle, Sweden
[3] Gavle Cty Hosp, Dept Surg, Gavle, Sweden
[4] Uppsala Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN; MEDIAN FOLLOW-UP; LOCAL RECURRENCE; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; DISTANT METASTASES; COLON-CANCER; OPEN-LABEL; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-024-15552-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The success of modern multimodal treatment in rectal cancer is dependent on risk prediction. Better knowledge of the risk of locoregional and distant recurrence, in relation to preoperative treatment, pathological stage, and commonly used risk factors, is needed when deciding on adjuvant therapy and surveillance.Methods The Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry was used to identify patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2018. Readily available variables, including patient, tumor, and treatment factors were exposures. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify important risk factors for recurrence and calculate recurrence risks.Results A total of 9428 curatively resected patients were included and followed for a median of 72 months. Eighteen percent had distal recurrence and 3% had locoregional recurrence at 5 years. Risk factors with major impact on distal recurrence were pT4a (hazard ratio [HR] 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-8.0), pN2b (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.7-4.2), tumor deposit (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5-1.9), lymph node yield (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8), and tumor level 0-5 cm (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8). Pathologic stage and number of risk factors identified groups with markedly different recurrence risks in all neoadjuvant treatment groups.Conclusions Readily available risk factors, as a complement to stage, are still valid and robust in all neoadjuvant treatment groups. Tumor deposit is important, while circumferential resection margin might no longer be important with improved oncological treatments and high-quality TME surgery. Tailored surveillance is possible in selected groups using risk stratification based on stage and risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:5570 / 5584
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Complete response rates in rectal cancer: Temporal changes over a decade in a population-based nationwide cohort
    Temmink, Sofieke J. D.
    Martling, Anna
    Angenete, Eva
    Nilsson, Per J.
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (11):
  • [32] Dispositional optimism and all-cause mortality after esophageal cancer surgery: a nationwide population-based cohort study
    Yangjun Liu
    Erik Pettersson
    Anna Schandl
    Sheraz Markar
    Asif Johar
    Pernilla Lagergren
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 9461 - 9469
  • [33] Oncological Impact of High Vascular Tie After Surgery for Rectal Cancer A Nationwide Cohort Study
    Bostrom, Petrus
    Hultberg, Daniel Kverneng
    Haggstrom, Jenny
    Haapamaki, Markku M.
    Matthiessen, Peter
    Rutegard, Jorgen
    Rutegard, Martin
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (03) : E236 - E244
  • [34] Dispositional optimism and all-cause mortality after esophageal cancer surgery: a nationwide population-based cohort study
    Liu, Yangjun
    Pettersson, Erik
    Schandl, Anna
    Markar, Sheraz
    Johar, Asif
    Lagergren, Pernilla
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (11) : 9461 - 9469
  • [35] Risk factors for local recurrence in patients with clinical stage II/III low rectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan
    Kozu, Takumi
    Akiyoshi, Takashi
    Sakamoto, Takashi
    Yamaguchi, Tomohiro
    Yamamoto, Seiichiro
    Okamura, Ryosuke
    Konishi, Tsuyoshi
    Umemoto, Yoshihisa
    Hida, Koya
    Naitoh, Takeshi
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2025, 9 (01): : 128 - 136
  • [36] Pattern of rectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery
    Rasanen, Minna
    Carpelan-Holmstrom, Monika
    Mustonen, Harri
    Renkonen-Sinisalo, Laura
    Lepisto, Anna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (06) : 775 - 785
  • [37] A Population-Based Study of Secondary Prostate Cancer Risk after Radiotherapy in Male Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Chuang, Jen-Pin
    Lee, Yen-Chien
    Lee, Jenq-Chang
    Lu, Chin-Li
    Li, Chung-Yi
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (04):
  • [38] Population-based study of morbidity risk associated with pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    van der Sluis, F. J.
    Couwenberg, A. M.
    de Bock, G. H.
    Intven, M. P. W.
    Reerink, O.
    van Leeuwen, B. L.
    van Westreenen, H. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (01) : 131 - 139
  • [39] Lung Cancer Prognosis Before and After Recurrence in a Population-Based Setting
    Consonni, Dario
    Pierobon, Mariaelena
    Gail, Mitchell H.
    Rubagotti, Maurizia
    Rotunno, Melissa
    Goldstein, Alisa
    Goldin, Lynn
    Lubin, Jay
    Wacholder, Sholom
    Caporaso, Neil E.
    Bertazzi, Pier Alberto
    Tucker, Margaret A.
    Pesatori, Angela C.
    Landi, Maria Teresa
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2015, 107 (06):
  • [40] Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Study Using Quality Indicators
    Youl, Philippa
    Philpot, Shoni
    Theile, David E.
    JOURNAL FOR HEALTHCARE QUALITY, 2019, 41 (06) : E90 - E100