Development of a Nomogram Model to Predict the Risk of Stricture Recurrence after Urethroplasty: A Retrospective Study

被引:0
|
作者
Guo, Hang [1 ]
Dai, Zhenghao [1 ]
Zhong, Lichang [2 ]
Jiang, Yiwen [3 ]
Lu, Yuting [3 ]
Liang, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 6, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Peoples Hosp 6, Shanghai Inst Ultrasound Med, Dept Ultrasound Med,Med Coll, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Clin Med, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2024年 / 77卷 / 02期
关键词
urethral stricture; urethroplasty; recurrence of stenosis; influencing factor; nomogram; URETHRAL STRICTURE;
D O I
10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247702.26
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: A retrospective study was performed to analyse the influencing factors of stricture recurrence after urethroplasty and to establish a predictive nomogram model. Methods: The clinical data of patients who underwent urethroplasty in our hospital from January 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Depending on whether stenosis occurs six months after surgery, the patients were divided into recurrence and nonrecurrence groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed on the indicators with statistically significant differences between the two groups in single factor analysis to analyse the influencing factors of postoperative recurrence risk of stricture. X64.4.1.3 version R language and external source packages were used to build the nomogram model. The nomogram was internally validated through 10 -fold cross -validation, and C -index was calculated. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was employed to evaluate the results of the internal validation. Results: Amongst 105 patients who underwent urethroplasty in our hospital, 15 patients with recurrence were included in the recurrence group, and 90 patients without recurrence were included in the nonrecurrence group. The length of stricture segment, history of urethroplasty and smoking history within 3 months before surgery were risk factors for stricture recurrence, with odds ratio (OR) values of 1.874 (95% CI: 1.103-5.725), 1.670 (95% CI: 1.105-2.904) and 1.740 (95% CI: 1.456-5.785), respectively. The constructed nomogram obtained an average AUC of 0.842 and an average C -index of 0.794, calculated after 200 times of 10 -fold cross -validation. Conclusions: From the data of this study, it can be deduced that the influencing factors of stricture recurrence after urethroplasty include the length of stricture segment, history of urethroplasty and smoking history of 3 months before surgery. Using the above factors as a basis to construct a predictive nomogram model is helpful to screen high -risk patients with recurrence of stricture after urethroplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 209
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors for recurrence of urethral stricture after urethroplasty
    Quelal, Karen Estefania Valdiviezo
    Chala, Balbina Ibeth Garcia
    Benavides, Valeria Sophia Navas
    Barzallo, Daniel Esteban Maldonado
    Gonzalez, Maria Alexandra Verdugo
    Alvarado, Valeria Nicolle Alava
    Pintado, Johnny Andres Aguay
    Cevallos, Juan Daniel Cadena
    Mendoza, Ana Bertha Lucas
    REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE HIPERTENSION, 2024, 19 (01): : 10 - 14
  • [2] Risk of urethral stricture recurrence increases over time after urethroplasty
    Han, Justin S.
    Liu, Joceline
    Hofer, Matthias D.
    Fuchs, Amanda
    Chi, Amanda
    Stein, Daniel
    Dielubanza, Elodi
    Ballek, Nathaniel
    Gonzalez, Chris M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (07) : 695 - 699
  • [3] Risk factors associated with urethral stricture recurrence after end-to-end urethroplasty and buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty
    Pallares-Mendez, Rigoberto
    Cota-Aguero, Jesus Arturo
    Gutierrez-Gonzalez, Adrian
    Cervantes-Miranda, Daniel Eduardo
    Hernandez-Aranda, Katherine Lyn
    Ochoa-Arvizo, Mario
    Aguilar-Rivera, Luis Gerardo
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2022, 89 (02) : 268 - 273
  • [4] DEFINING STRICTURE RECURRENCE AFTER URETHROPLASTY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Meeks, Joshua J.
    Erickson, Bradley A.
    Granieri, Michael A.
    Gonzalez, Christopher M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04) : 16 - 16
  • [5] Smoking is an independent risk factor for stricture recurrence after the urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Yu-cheng
    Lin, Lede
    Luo, Zhumei
    Jin, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2023, 49 (01): : 8 - 23
  • [6] Nomogram and competing risk model to predict recurrence after curative surgical resection of PDAC
    Ge, Jia-chen
    Tao, Ming
    Li, Lei
    Ma, Zhao-lai
    Jiang, Bin
    Yuan, Chun-hui
    Wang, Hang-yan
    Peng, Ying
    Xiu, Dian-rong
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2021, 21 (06) : 1102 - 1111
  • [7] Factors Predicting Urethral Stricture Recurrence after Dorsal Onlay Augmented, Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty
    Shalkamy, Osama
    Abdelazim, Hassan
    Elshazly, Ahmed
    Soliman, Ahmed
    Agha, Mohammed
    Tagreda, Ibrahim
    Hindawy, Mohammed
    Kotb, Ayman
    Farid, Mamdouh
    Ahmed, Abul-fotouh
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, 105 (3-4) : 269 - 277
  • [8] Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Endoscopic Management of Stricture Recurrence after Bulbar Urethroplasty
    Sukumar, Shyam
    Elliott, Sean P.
    Myers, Jeremy B.
    Voelzke, Bryan B.
    Smith, Thomas G., III
    Carolan, Alexandra M. C.
    Maidaa, Michael
    Vanni, Alex J.
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    Erickson, Bradley A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (04) : 837 - 841
  • [9] Long-term outcomes for 2-stage urethroplasty: an analysis of risk factors for urethral stricture recurrence
    James R. Furr
    Eric S. Wisenbaugh
    Joel Gelman
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 3903 - 3911
  • [10] Anastomotic fibrous ring as cause of stricture recurrence after bulbar onlay graft urethroplasty
    Barbagli, Guido
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Palminteri, Enzo
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (02) : 614 - 619