How useful are gene expression analyses of the endometrium for determination of endometrial receptivity in clinical practice?

被引:0
作者
Edimiris, Philippos [1 ,2 ]
Scheliga, Iwona [1 ,2 ]
Baston-Buest, Dunja-Maria [1 ,2 ]
Kruessel, Jan-Steffen [1 ,2 ]
Bielfeld, Alexandra P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fak, UniKiD Klin Geburtshilfe Gynakol & Reproduktionsme, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Univ Klinikum Dusseldorf, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE | 2024年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
Embryo transfer/timing; Recurrent implantation failure; Window of implantation; Microarray analysis; Next generation sequencing; RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; LIVE BIRTH; FROZEN; ARRAY; DIAGNOSIS; CYCLES; WINDOW;
D O I
10.1007/s10304-024-00561-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The synchronization between embryonic development and the receptive state of the endometrium significantly influences the success of assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Endometrial gene expression analysis was introduced to determine the optimal time for embryo transfer using molecular biology. Aim Does an endometrial expression analysis improve the reproductive outcome and is the application in clinical practice justified? Material and methods Overview of relevant publications on the topic of endometrial receptivity analysis. Results The studies published so far on the reproductive outcomes of personalized vs. standardized embryo transfer mostly have a retrospective study design. Among the published prospective studies, the study by Doyle et al. proved to be important: it showed that the use of personalized embryo transfer in a cohort of patients with a good prognosis does not improve the reproductive outcome. There is a lack of high-quality data to answer the question of whether this also applies to a cohort with recurrent implantation failure. Conclusion Based on the research results to date, the routine use of endometrial gene expression analysis is not recommended. It is possible that a prospective study announced for 2026 will provide new evidence that will enable its use in patients with repeated implantation failure.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 117
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation
    Achache, Hanna
    Revel, Ariel
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2006, 12 (06) : 731 - 746
  • [2] Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer?
    Bassil, Rawad
    Casper, Robert
    Samara, Nivin
    Hsieh, Tzu-Bou
    Barzilay, Eran
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Haas, Jigal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (07) : 1301 - 1305
  • [3] Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) test: an unproven technology
    Ben Rafael, Zion
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2021, 2021 (02)
  • [4] Clemente-Císcar M, 2018, HUM REPROD, V33, P8
  • [5] clinicaltrials, STUD DET INT NONS ST
  • [6] Evaluation of the endometrial receptivity assay and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy in overcoming recurrent implantation failure
    Cozzolino, Mauro
    Diaz-Gimeno, Patricia
    Pellicer, Antonio
    Garrido, Nicolas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2020, 37 (12) : 2989 - 2997
  • [7] The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity
    Diaz-Gimeno, Patricia
    Ruiz-Alonso, Maria
    Blesa, David
    Bosch, Nuria
    Martinez-Conejero, Jose A.
    Alama, Pilar
    Garrido, Nicolas
    Pellicer, Antonio
    Simon, Carlos
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (02) : 508 - 517
  • [8] A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature
    Diaz-Gimeno, Patricia
    Horcajadas, Jose A.
    Martinez-Conejero, Jose A.
    Esteban, Francisco J.
    Alama, Pilar
    Pellicer, Antonio
    Simon, Carlos
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (01) : 50 - U611
  • [9] Effect of Timing by Endometrial Receptivity Testing vs Standard Timing of Frozen Embryo Transfer on Live Birth in Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Doyle, Nicole
    Jahandideh, Samad
    Hill, Micah J.
    Widra, Eric A.
    Levy, Michael
    Devine, Kate
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (21): : 2117 - 2125
  • [10] One center experience with a personalized frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure
    Edimiris, Philippos
    Doehmen, Cornelius
    Baston-Buest, Dunja Maria
    Kruessel, Jan-Steffen
    Bielfeld, Alexandra Petra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2023, 40 (07) : 1639 - 1647