Thermodynamic design and analysis of air-liquefied energy storage combined with LNG regasification system

被引:9
作者
Jiang, Qingfeng [1 ,2 ]
Wan, Shiqing [1 ]
Pan, Chongyao [1 ]
Feng, Guozeng [1 ]
Li, Huaibing [2 ]
Feng, Hansheng [3 ]
Meng, Bo [4 ]
Gu, Jiayang [1 ]
Feng, Yunchu [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power, Zhenjiang 212003, Peoples R China
[2] Zhangjiagang Furui Special Equipment Co LTD, Zhangjiagang 215637, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Plasma Phys, Hefei 230031, Peoples R China
[4] Sinopec Petr Engn Jianghan Co Ltd, Wuhan 430000, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Exergy efficiency; Gasification; LNG; Liquefied air energy storage; Thermodynamics; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; HEAT; COLD; POWER; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.01.023
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
For cutting down the energy consumption and improving the cold energy conversion efficiency of the traditional liquefied air energy storage system (LAES), a novel energy system integration solution is proposed by combining the LAES with liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification process. In this paper, the principal energy storage and energy release processes are simulated by Aspen Hysys. The influences of air mass flow rate and LNG regasification pressure on the performance are analyzed. The results indicate that the introducted system can attain 137.82 % round-trip efficiency, which is about 20 % higher than the conventional LAES system. Besides, the energy capacity reaches up to 10.87 MW and the exergy efficiency is 39.58 % during long-distance transportation. It's noteworthy that the power output in the liquefied air energy discharging period far exceeds the power generation from the organic Rankine cycle. The higher LNG transport pressure, the worse LNG-LAES system performance. When the air mass flow rate raises from 40,000 kg/h to 64,000 kg/h, the exergy efficiency is 3.4 % higher than the original, while the round-trip efficiency decreases by 29.79 %. Finally, through economic viability calculations, the dynamic recovery period of the LNG-LAES system is 5.41 years.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 340
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an innovative hybrid multi-generating liquid air energy storage system [J].
Babaei, Seyed Mostafa ;
Nabat, Mohammad Hossein ;
Lashgari, Fatemeh ;
Pedram, Mona Zamani ;
Arabkoohsar, Ahmad .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2021, 43
[2]   How can LNG-fuelled ships meet decarbonisation targets? An environmental and economic analysis [J].
Balcombe, Paul ;
Staffell, Iain ;
Kerdan, Ivan Garcia ;
Speirs, Jamie F. ;
Brandon, Nigel P. ;
Hawkes, Adam D. .
ENERGY, 2021, 227
[3]   Economic evaluation of energy efficient hydrate based desalination utilizing cold energy from liquefied natural gas (LNG) [J].
Chong, Zheng Rong ;
He, Tianbiao ;
Babu, Ponnivalavan ;
Zheng, Jia-nan ;
Linga, Praveen .
DESALINATION, 2019, 463 :69-80
[4]   Numerical investigation of dynamic characteristics for expansion power generation system of liquefied air energy storage [J].
Cui, Shuangshuang ;
Lu, Chang ;
Shi, Xingping ;
Du, Dongmei ;
He, Qing ;
Liu, Wenyi .
ENERGY, 2021, 226
[5]   Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) as a large-scale storage technology for renewable energy integration - A review of investigation studies and near perspectives of LAES [J].
Damak, Cyrine ;
Leducq, Denis ;
Hong Minh Hoang ;
Negro, Daniele ;
Delahaye, Anthony .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION, 2020, 110 :208-218
[6]  
Fu Q., 2005, Thermodynamic analysis method of energy system
[7]  
Guizhi Xu., 2018, J GLOB ENERGY INTERC, V1, P330
[8]   Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of liquefied air energy storage system [J].
He Qing ;
Wang Lijian ;
Zhou Qian ;
Lu Chang ;
Du Dongmei ;
Liu Wenyi .
ENERGY, 2019, 173 :162-173
[9]   Cascade utilization of LNG cold energy by integrating cryogenic energy storage, organic Rankine cycle and direct cooling [J].
He, Tianbiao ;
Lv, Hongyu ;
Shao, Zixian ;
Zhang, Jibao ;
Xing, Xialian ;
Ma, Huigang .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 277
[10]   Exergoeconomic Optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle for Low-Temperature Geothermal Heat Sources [J].
Heberle, F. ;
Bassermann, P. ;
Preissinger, M. ;
Brueggemann, D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMODYNAMICS, 2012, 15 (02) :119-126