Natural experiments in corporate social responsibility research: a literature review

被引:0
作者
Yu C. [1 ]
Che T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Research Center for Smarter Supply Chain, Dongwu Business School, Soochow University, No. 50, Donghuan Road, Jiangsu, Suzhou
来源
International Journal of Internet Manufacturing and Services | 2021年 / 8卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
corporate social responsibility; CSR; literature review; natural experiments;
D O I
10.1504/ijims.2021.10047217
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) research provides guidance and helps for corporate activities. However, researchers may face endogeneity problems that can interfere with the research results of CSR research. The natural experimental method is a research method that can solve these problems, and the number of papers on CSR research using such methods in FT50 journals has increased in the past decade. Therefore, summarising these studies and providing guidance for CSR researchers is essential. We summarise the general process of designing natural experiments in CSR studies through a review of CSR-related studies that used natural experimental methods. The specific steps of designing natural experiments in CSR research include the following: selecting research topics and hypotheses, determining independent and dependent variables, selecting appropriate interventions, and using corresponding data analysis methods. Besides, this study discusses the strengths and limitations of natural experiments in CSR research and proposes future research directions. © 2021 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 149
页数:26
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Antonakis J., Bendahan S., Jacquart P., Et al., Causality and endogeneity: problems and solutions, The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations, (2014)
  • [2] Attig N., Boubakri N., Ghoul S.E., Et al., Firm internationalization and corporate social responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 2, pp. 171-197, (2016)
  • [3] Benton J.S., Anderson J., Hunter R.F., Et al., The effect of changing the built environment on physical activity: a quantitative review of the risk of bias in natural experiments, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13, 1, pp. 107-124, (2016)
  • [4] Bramante C.T., Thornton R.L.J., Bennett W.L., Et al., Systematic review of natural experiments for childhood obesity prevention and control, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 56, 1, pp. 147-158, (2019)
  • [5] Burbano V.C., Mamer J., Snyder J.M., Pro bono as a human capital learning and screening mechanism: evidence from law firms, Strategic Management Journal, 39, 11, pp. 2899-2920, (2018)
  • [6] Cahan S.F., Chen C., Chen L., Social norms and CSR performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 3, pp. 493-508, (2017)
  • [7] Cao J., Liang H., Zhan X., Peer effects of corporate social responsibility, Management Science, 65, 12, pp. 5487-5503, (2019)
  • [8] Carroll A.B., The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34, 4, pp. 39-48, (1991)
  • [9] Chatterji A.K., Toffel M.W., How firms respond to being rated, Strategic Management Journal, 31, 9, pp. 917-945, (2010)
  • [10] Chatterji A.K., Durand R., Levine D.I., Et al., Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers, Strategic Management Journal, 37, 8, pp. 1597-1614, (2016)